These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31353918)

  • 1. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.
    Ouweneel DM; de Brabander J; Karami M; Sjauw KD; Engström AE; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Beijk MA; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; Cherpanath TG; Driessen AH; Cocchieri R; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):338-349. PubMed ID: 30403366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Circulatory Support with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and/or Impella for Cardiogenic Shock During Myocardial Infarction.
    Mourad M; Gaudard P; De La Arena P; Eliet J; Zeroual N; Rouvière P; Roubille F; Albat B; Colson PH
    ASAIO J; 2018; 64(6):708-714. PubMed ID: 29240628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.
    Kieserman JM; Kuznetsov IA; Park J; Schurr JW; Toubat O; Olia S; Bermudez C; Cevasco M; Wald J
    Int J Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; 47(6):401-410. PubMed ID: 38853663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.
    Radakovic D; Zittermann A; Knezevic A; Razumov A; Opacic D; Wienrautner N; Flottmann C; Rojas SV; Fox H; Schramm R; Morshuis M; Rudolph V; Gummert J; Deutsch MA
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 34(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34999807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lemor A; Hosseini Dehkordi SH; Basir MB; Villablanca PA; Jain T; Koenig GC; Alaswad K; Moses JW; Kapur NK; O'Neill W
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 32605901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Karatolios K; Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Jerrentrup A; Schieffer B
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 33185749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP
    Loehn T; O'Neill WW; Lange B; Pfluecke C; Schweigler T; Mierke J; Waessnig N; Mahlmann A; Youssef A; Speiser U; Strasser RH; Ibrahim K
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 30456984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Bogerd M; Ten Berg S; Peters EJ; Vlaar APJ; Engström AE; Otterspoor LC; Jung C; Westermann D; Pöss J; Thiele H; Schrage B; Henriques JPS
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2023 Nov; 25(11):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 37671582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Budget Impact Analysis of Impella CP
    Delmas C; Pernot M; Le Guyader A; Joret R; Roze S; Lebreton G
    Adv Ther; 2022 Mar; 39(3):1293-1309. PubMed ID: 35067868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery.
    Sayed S; Schimmer C; Shade I; Leyh R; Aleksic I
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 May; 12(1):38. PubMed ID: 28532425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival after refractory cardiogenic shock is comparable in patients with Impella and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation when adjusted for SAVE score.
    Schiller P; Hellgren L; Vikholm P
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 30406678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Percutaneous Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy with Impella Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.
    Patel SM; Lipinski J; Al-Kindi SG; Patel T; Saric P; Li J; Nadeem F; Ladas T; Alaiti A; Phillips A; Medalion B; Deo S; Elgudin Y; Costa MA; Osman MN; Attizzani GF; Oliveira GH; Sareyyupoglu B; Bezerra HG
    ASAIO J; 2019 Jan; 65(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 29489461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
    Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.
    Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Scheele N; Al Eryani H; Tousoulis D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):943-955. PubMed ID: 33729726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefit of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella (ECpella) therapy in acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock.
    Shibasaki I; Masawa T; Abe S; Ogawa H; Takei Y; Tezuka M; Seki M; Kato T; Watanabe R; Koshiji N; Saitou S; Ogata K; Haruyama Y; Toyoda S; Fukuda H
    J Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 80(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 35288000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Garan AR; Takeda K; Salna M; Vandenberge J; Doshi D; Karmpaliotis D; Kirtane AJ; Takayama H; Kurlansky P
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(9):e012171. PubMed ID: 31041870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.