BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31354073)

  • 21. Metadata Concepts for Advancing the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Research.
    Badawy R; Hameed F; Bataille L; Little MA; Claes K; Saria S; Cedarbaum JM; Stephenson D; Neville J; Maetzler W; Espay AJ; Bloem BR; Simuni T; Karlin DR
    Digit Biomark; 2019; 3(3):116-132. PubMed ID: 32175520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scientific Reproducibility in Biomedical Research: Provenance Metadata Ontology for Semantic Annotation of Study Description.
    Sahoo SS; Valdez J; Rueschman M
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():1070-1079. PubMed ID: 28269904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ECRIN - CESSDA strategies for cross metadata mappings in selected areas between life sciences and social sciences and humanities.
    Ohmann C; Moilanen K; Kleemola M; Canham S; Panagiotopoulou M
    Open Res Eur; 2023; 3():180. PubMed ID: 37965479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Making metadata usable in a multi-national research setting.
    Ellul C; Foord J; Mooney J
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):909-18. PubMed ID: 23399024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Concept for a Data Dictionary System Supporting for Clinical Research.
    Strickler M; Zbinden C; Saccilotto R; Denecke K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 258():158-162. PubMed ID: 30942736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Involving decision-makers in the research process: Challenges of implementing the accountability for reasonableness approach to priority setting at the district level in Tanzania.
    Maluka S; Kamuzora P; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
    Glob Public Health; 2014; 9(7):760-72. PubMed ID: 24921238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A metadata framework for computational phenotypes.
    Spotnitz M; Acharya N; Cimino JJ; Murphy S; Namjou B; Crimmins N; Walunas T; Liu C; Crosslin D; Benoit B; Rosenthal E; Pacheco JA; Ostropolets A; Reyes Nieva H; Patterson JS; Richter LR; Callahan TJ; Elhussein A; Pang C; Kiryluk K; Nestor J; Khan A; Mohan S; Minty E; Chung W; Wei WQ; Natarajan K; Weng C
    JAMIA Open; 2023 Jul; 6(2):ooad032. PubMed ID: 37181728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Metadata Made Easy: Develop and Use Domain-Specific Metadata Schemes by following the dmdScheme approach.
    Krug RM; Petchey OL
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jul; 11(14):9174-9181. PubMed ID: 34306613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real social analytics: A contribution towards a phenomenology of a digital world.
    Couldry N; Fotopoulou A; Dickens L
    Br J Sociol; 2016 Mar; 67(1):118-37. PubMed ID: 26891120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences.
    McQuilton P; Gonzalez-Beltran A; Rocca-Serra P; Thurston M; Lister A; Maguire E; Sansone SA
    Database (Oxford); 2016; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27189610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ProvCaRe: Characterizing scientific reproducibility of biomedical research studies using semantic provenance metadata.
    Sahoo SS; Valdez J; Kim M; Rueschman M; Redline S
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jan; 121():10-18. PubMed ID: 30545485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Collaboration Networks and Career Trajectories: What Do Metadata from Data Repositories Tell Us?
    Jeff H; Jian Q; Sarah B; Alexander S
    Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol; 2022; 59(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 37692532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The structural shift and collaboration capacity in GenBank Networks: A longitudinal study.
    Qin J; Hemsley J; Bratt SE
    Quant Sci Stud; 2022; 3(1):174-193. PubMed ID: 35434639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Building blocks for social accountability: a conceptual framework to guide medical schools.
    Preston R; Larkins S; Taylor J; Judd J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):227. PubMed ID: 27565709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing Public Metabolomics Metadata, Towards Improving Quality.
    Ferreira JD; InĂ¡cio B; Salek RM; Couto FM
    J Integr Bioinform; 2017 Dec; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 29236679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FAANG, establishing metadata standards, validation and best practices for the farmed and companion animal community.
    Harrison PW; Fan J; Richardson D; Clarke L; Zerbino D; Cochrane G; Archibald AL; Schmidt CJ; Flicek P
    Anim Genet; 2018 Dec; 49(6):520-526. PubMed ID: 30311252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Jscatter, a program for evaluation and analysis of experimental data.
    Biehl R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218789. PubMed ID: 31233549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. iProX: an integrated proteome resource.
    Ma J; Chen T; Wu S; Yang C; Bai M; Shu K; Li K; Zhang G; Jin Z; He F; Hermjakob H; Zhu Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(D1):D1211-D1217. PubMed ID: 30252093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The roles of integration in molecular systems biology.
    O'Malley MA; Soyer OS
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2012 Mar; 43(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 22326073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protocol statements, physicalism, and metadata: Otto Neurath on scientific evidence.
    Bentley J
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Dec; 96():125-134. PubMed ID: 36272271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.