182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31354082)
1. Analysing the likelihood of caesarean birth after implementation of the two-childbirth policy in China, using the Ten Group Classification System.
Wen J; Chen Q; Luo Q
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):336-341. PubMed ID: 31354082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.
Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.
Akadri AA; Imaralu JO; Salami OF; Nwankpa CC; Adepoju AA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Apr; 23(1):243. PubMed ID: 37046219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Barčaitė E; Kemeklienė G; Railaitė DR; Bartusevičius A; Maleckienė L; Nadišauskienė R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2015 Nov; 51(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 26674145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new way of looking at Caesarean section births.
McCarthy FP; Rigg L; Cady L; Cullinane F
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 47(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 17627688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Robson's Ten-Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro-Peristat study.
Zeitlin J; Durox M; Macfarlane A; Alexander S; Heller G; Loghi M; Nijhuis J; Sól Ólafsdóttir H; Mierzejewska E; Gissler M; Blondel B;
BJOG; 2021 Aug; 128(9):1444-1453. PubMed ID: 33338307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Caesarean Section Rates at Kathmandu Model Hospital Using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.
Poudel R; Dangal G; Karki A; Pradhan HK; Shrestha R; Bhattachan K; Bajracharya N; Tiwari KD; Bharti S
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2020 Jan; 17(4):491-494. PubMed ID: 32001854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the caesarean section rate using the 10-Group Robson classification at Benha University Hospital, Egypt.
Jadoon B; Assar TM; Nucier AAAR; Raziq HEA; Abd El-Azym Saad AS; Megahed Amer W
Women Birth; 2020 Mar; 33(2):e105-e110. PubMed ID: 30987799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Matei A; Dimitriu MC; Roșu GA; Furău CG; Ionescu CA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in caesarean section rates in Europe from 2015 to 2019 using Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Euro-Peristat study.
Amyx M; Philibert M; Farr A; Donati S; Smárason AK; Tica V; Velebil P; Alexander S; Durox M; Elorriaga MF; Heller G; Kyprianou T; Mierzejewska E; Verdenik I; Zīle-Velika I; Zeitlin J;
BJOG; 2024 Mar; 131(4):444-454. PubMed ID: 37779035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the 10-Group Classification System to analyze how the population control policy change in China has affected cesarean delivery.
Zhang Y; Gu N; Wang Z; Zheng M; Hu Y; Dai Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 138(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 28502115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.
Liang J; Mu Y; Li X; Tang W; Wang Y; Liu Z; Huang X; Scherpbier RW; Guo S; Li M; Dai L; Deng K; Deng C; Li Q; Kang L; Zhu J; Ronsmans C
BMJ; 2018 Mar; 360():k817. PubMed ID: 29506980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingan D; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 25371294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.
D'Agostini Marin DF; da Rosa Wernke A; Dannehl D; de Araujo D; Koch GF; Marçal Zanoni K; Baschirotto Dorigon Coral K; Valeriano Guimarães N; Feuerschuette O; Pinto Moehlecke Iser B
BJOG; 2022 Jan; 129(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 34529333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting Caesarean Delivery in Quebec Using the Robson Classification System.
Roberge S; Dubé E; Blouin S; Chaillet N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Mar; 39(3):152-156. PubMed ID: 28343556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to categorise operative vaginal delivery.
O'Leary BD; Kane DT; Kruseman Aretz N; Geary MP; Malone FD; Hehir MP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Dec; 60(6):858-864. PubMed ID: 32350863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.
Nakamura-Pereira M; do Carmo Leal M; Esteves-Pereira AP; Domingues RM; Torres JA; Dias MA; Moreira ME
Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):128. PubMed ID: 27766941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caesarean section rates from Malaysian tertiary hospitals using Robson's 10-group classification.
Karalasingam SD; Jeganathan R; Jegasothy R; Reidpath DD
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jan; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32005188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of select maternal groups to temporal trends in rates of caesarean section.
Allen VM; Baskett TF; O'Connell CM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Jul; 32(7):633-41. PubMed ID: 20707951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
