162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31354857)
21. A preliminary study of the antibacterial potential of cetylpyridinium chloride in root canals infected by E. faecalis.
Estrela C; Sousa-Neto MD; Alves DR; Alencar AH; Santos TO; Pécora JD
Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 23338255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The
Ramezanali F; Samimi S; Kharazifard M; Afkhami F
Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(4):304-308. PubMed ID: 27790260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Antimicrobial efficacy of 4.2% sodium hypochlorite adjusted to pH 12, 7.5, and 6.5 in infected human root canals.
Mercade M; Duran-Sindreu F; Kuttler S; Roig M; Durany N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 19071035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Antibacterial effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on
Forough Reyhani M; Rezagholizadeh Y; Narimani MR; Rezagholizadeh L; Mazani M; Barhaghi MHS; Mahmoodzadeh Y
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2017; 11(4):215-221. PubMed ID: 29354247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Antibacterial effect of different root canal sealers on three bacterial species.
Heyder M; Kranz S; Völpel A; Pfister W; Watts DC; Jandt KD; Sigusch BW
Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 23523285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamic therapy, diode laser, and sodium hypochlorite and their combinations on endodontic pathogens.
Sarda RA; Shetty RM; Tamrakar A; Shetty SY
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Dec; 28():265-272. PubMed ID: 31585175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laboratory Comparison of the Anti-Bacterial Effects of Spearmint Extract and Hypochlorite Sodium on Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteria.
S H; H Z; M B; R H
J Dent Biomater; 2016 Dec; 3(4):322-326. PubMed ID: 28959760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.
Arslan S; Ozbilge H; Kaya EG; Er O
Saudi Med J; 2011 May; 32(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 21556468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Antibacterial effects of two different types of laser and aqueous ozone against Enterococcus faecalis in root canals.
Zan R; Hubbezoglu I; Sümer Z; Tunç T; Tanalp J
Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Apr; 31(4):150-4. PubMed ID: 23484588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of hydroalcoholic extract of Aloe vera, garlic, and 5% sodium hypochlorite as root canal irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study.
Karkare SR; Ahire NP; Khedkar SU
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2015; 33(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 26381627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants associated with cetrimide against biofilm and planktonic Enterococcus faecalis.
Nascimento CA; Tanomaru-Filho M; Faria-Junior NB; Faria G; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 25707833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Antibacterial effect of urushiol on
Kim SW; Shin DH
Restor Dent Endod; 2017 Feb; 42(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28194365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates.
Spratt DA; Pratten J; Wilson M; Gulabivala K
Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 11482142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The anti-dermatophyte activity of Commiphora molmol.
Mahboubi M; Kashani LM
Pharm Biol; 2016; 54(4):720-5. PubMed ID: 26427766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro comparison of the antibacterial effect of three intracanal irrigants and diode laser on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis.
Ashofteh K; Sohrabi K; Iranparvar K; Chiniforush N
Iran J Microbiol; 2014 Feb; 6(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 25954488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of super-oxidized water (Sterilox®) and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis in a bovine root canal model.
Rossi-Fedele G; Figueiredo JA; Steier L; Canullo L; Steier G; Roberts AP
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 21085808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bactericidal efficacy of three parameters of Nd:YAP laser irradiation against Enterococcus faecalis compared with NaOCl irrigation.
Liu T; Huang Z; Ju Y; Tang X
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Mar; 34(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 30069683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Antimicrobial activity of three root canal irrigants on enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study.
Ahangari Z; Samiee M; Yolmeh MA; Eslami G
Iran Endod J; 2008; 3(2):33-7. PubMed ID: 24171016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant, Bingpeng Irrigant, and Fufang Bingpeng Irrigant as Endodontic Irrigants During Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation.
Shi Y; Deng Z; Yang Y; Cui L; Chen T; Hu M; Xie L; Yang J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():145. PubMed ID: 31134160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan and other endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.
Shenoi PR; Morey ES; Makade CS; Gunwal MK; Khode RT; Wanmali SS
Gen Dent; 2016; 64(5):60-3. PubMed ID: 27599284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
