These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31356003)
1. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions. Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A second endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration for cytology identifies high-risk pancreatic cysts overlooked by current guidelines. Faias S; Pereira L; Fonseca R; Chaves P; Dias Pereira A; Cravo M Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 32960508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions. Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial. Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study. Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Siddiqui AA; Brown LJ; Hong SK; Draganova-Tacheva RA; Korenblit J; Loren DE; Kowalski TE; Solomides C Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(11):3370-5. PubMed ID: 21688127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency. Syed A; Babich O; Rao B; Singh S; Carleton N; Gulati A; Kulkarni A; Garg M; Farah K; Kochhar G; Morrissey S; Mitre M; Kulkarni A; Dhawan M; Silverman JF; Pharaon M; Thakkar S Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 31313531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center. Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors determining diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions: a multicentre Asian study. Lim LG; Lakhtakia S; Ang TL; Vu CK; Dy F; Chong VH; Khor CJ; Lim WC; Doshi BK; Varadarajulu S; Yasuda K; Wong JY; Chan YH; Nga ME; Ho KY; Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Jun; 58(6):1751-7. PubMed ID: 23314918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of SpyGlass for pancreatic cystic lesions: comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with SpyGlass. Du C; Chai N; Linghu E; Li H; Feng X; Wang X; Tang P Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):904-910. PubMed ID: 33650000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study. Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic Analysis of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through the Needle Microforceps Biopsies Accurately Identifies Mucinous Pancreas Cysts. Yang D; Trindade AJ; Yachimski P; Benias P; Nieto J; Manvar A; Ho S; Esnakula A; Gamboa A; Sethi A; Gupte A; Khara HS; Diehl DL; El Chafic A; Shah J; Forsmark CE; Draganov PV Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 17(8):1587-1596. PubMed ID: 30471456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Eloubeidi MA; Tamhane A; Jhala N; Chhieng D; Jhala D; Crowe DR; Eltoum IA Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 101(12):2841-7. PubMed ID: 17026562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study. Sato J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Fujie S; Kaneko J; Satoh T; Matsubayashi H; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30676114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist. Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy. Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology on the differentiation of malignant and benign pancreatic cystic lesions: a single-center experience. Oguz D; Öztaş E; Kalkan IH; Tayfur O; Cicek B; Aydog G; Kurt M; Beyazit Y; Etik D; Nadir I; Sahin B J Dig Dis; 2013 Mar; 14(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 23167591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]