506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31356003)
1. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.
Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A second endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration for cytology identifies high-risk pancreatic cysts overlooked by current guidelines.
Faias S; Pereira L; Fonseca R; Chaves P; Dias Pereira A; Cravo M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 32960508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions.
Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
Siddiqui AA; Brown LJ; Hong SK; Draganova-Tacheva RA; Korenblit J; Loren DE; Kowalski TE; Solomides C
Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(11):3370-5. PubMed ID: 21688127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency.
Syed A; Babich O; Rao B; Singh S; Carleton N; Gulati A; Kulkarni A; Garg M; Farah K; Kochhar G; Morrissey S; Mitre M; Kulkarni A; Dhawan M; Silverman JF; Pharaon M; Thakkar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 31313531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors determining diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions: a multicentre Asian study.
Lim LG; Lakhtakia S; Ang TL; Vu CK; Dy F; Chong VH; Khor CJ; Lim WC; Doshi BK; Varadarajulu S; Yasuda K; Wong JY; Chan YH; Nga ME; Ho KY;
Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Jun; 58(6):1751-7. PubMed ID: 23314918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of SpyGlass for pancreatic cystic lesions: comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with SpyGlass.
Du C; Chai N; Linghu E; Li H; Feng X; Wang X; Tang P
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):904-910. PubMed ID: 33650000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic Analysis of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through the Needle Microforceps Biopsies Accurately Identifies Mucinous Pancreas Cysts.
Yang D; Trindade AJ; Yachimski P; Benias P; Nieto J; Manvar A; Ho S; Esnakula A; Gamboa A; Sethi A; Gupte A; Khara HS; Diehl DL; El Chafic A; Shah J; Forsmark CE; Draganov PV
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 17(8):1587-1596. PubMed ID: 30471456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management.
Eloubeidi MA; Tamhane A; Jhala N; Chhieng D; Jhala D; Crowe DR; Eltoum IA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 101(12):2841-7. PubMed ID: 17026562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study.
Sato J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Fujie S; Kaneko J; Satoh T; Matsubayashi H; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30676114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology on the differentiation of malignant and benign pancreatic cystic lesions: a single-center experience.
Oguz D; Öztaş E; Kalkan IH; Tayfur O; Cicek B; Aydog G; Kurt M; Beyazit Y; Etik D; Nadir I; Sahin B
J Dig Dis; 2013 Mar; 14(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 23167591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
