363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31356387)
1. AVATAR Assesses Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs in Ecologically Relevant Listening Situations.
Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):521-531. PubMed ID: 31356387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.
Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):615-628. PubMed ID: 33027198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age Affects Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs.
Devesse A; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1412-1415. PubMed ID: 31977724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Listening Effort Measured Using a Dual-task Paradigm in Adults With Different Amounts of Noise Exposure.
Degeest S; Kestens K; Keppler H
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):899-912. PubMed ID: 34619684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
Hunter CR; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Hearing-Protection Devices on Auditory Situational Awareness and Listening Effort.
Smalt CJ; Calamia PT; Dumas AP; Perricone JP; Patel T; Bobrow J; Collins PP; Markey ML; Quatieri TF
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 31045653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associations Between Auditory Working Memory, Self-Perceived Listening Effort, and Hearing Difficulty in Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Lander DM; Liu S; Roup CM
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):695-709. PubMed ID: 38229218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory, Visual, and Cognitive Abilities in Normal-Hearing Adults, Hearing Aid Users, and Cochlear Implant Users.
Ceuleers D; Keppler H; Degeest S; Baudonck N; Swinnen F; Kestens K; Dhooge I
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):679-694. PubMed ID: 38192017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part II: Measuring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with a hearing implant.
Bräcker T; Hellmiss S; Batsoulis C; Petzold T; Gabel L; Möltner A; Stöver T; Mlynski R; Lenarz T; Büchner A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):165-175. PubMed ID: 30880637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Musical Training and Working Memory in Adverse Listening Situations.
Escobar J; Mussoi BS; Silberer AB
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 32106117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part I: Measuring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with normal hearing.
Bräcker T; Opie J; Nopp P; Anderson I
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):138-146. PubMed ID: 30789103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
