These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31356593)

  • 1. Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism.
    Wessel JR; Huber DE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jul; 15(7):e1006927. PubMed ID: 31356593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.
    Dutra IC; Waller DA; Wessel JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29305533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. β-Bursts over Frontal Cortex Track the Surprise of Unexpected Events in Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Modalities.
    Tatz JR; Mather A; Wessel JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 35(3):485-508. PubMed ID: 36603039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surprise: Unexpected Action Execution and Unexpected Inhibition Recruit the Same Fronto-Basal-Ganglia Network.
    Sebastian A; Konken AM; Schaum M; Lieb K; Tüscher O; Jung P
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(11):2447-2456. PubMed ID: 33376157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band.
    Meindertsma T; Kloosterman NA; Engel AK; Wagenmakers EJ; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(35):7600-7610. PubMed ID: 30030396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suspense and surprise: on the relationship between expectancies and P3.
    Verleger R; Jaskowski P; Wauschkuhn B
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Jul; 31(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 10690916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Giard MH; Peronnet F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Sep; 11(5):473-90. PubMed ID: 10511637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial-by-trial surprise-decoding model for visual and auditory binary oddball tasks.
    Modirshanechi A; Kiani MM; Aghajan H
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():302-317. PubMed ID: 30980899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Neural Mechanism for Surprise-related Interruptions of Visuospatial Working Memory.
    Wessel JR
    Cereb Cortex; 2018 Jan; 28(1):199-212. PubMed ID: 27909006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisensory Competition Is Modulated by Sensory Pathway Interactions with Fronto-Sensorimotor and Default-Mode Network Regions.
    Huang S; Li Y; Zhang W; Zhang B; Liu X; Mo L; Chen Q
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 35(24):9064-77. PubMed ID: 26085631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.
    Foxe JJ; Simpson GV; Ahlfors SP; Saron CD
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):370-92. PubMed ID: 16086144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 16157441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.
    Wagner J; Wessel JR; Ghahremani A; Aron AR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 30(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 28880766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. P300: the similarities and differences in the scalp distribution of visual and auditory modality.
    Ji J; Porjesz B; Begleiter H; Chorlian D
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):315-27. PubMed ID: 10449262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Connectivity and local activity within the fronto-posterior brain network in schizophrenia.
    Sharma A; Weisbrod M; Bender S
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2013; 62():181-96. PubMed ID: 24053040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of motor activity on intracerebral ERPs: P3 latency variability in modified auditory odd-ball paradigms involving a motor task.
    Kanovský P; Streitová H; Klajblová H; Bares M; Daniel P; Rektor I
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2003 Sep; 33(4):159-68. PubMed ID: 14519543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surprise disrupts cognition via a fronto-basal ganglia suppressive mechanism.
    Wessel JR; Jenkinson N; Brittain JS; Voets SH; Aziz TZ; Aron AR
    Nat Commun; 2016 Apr; 7():11195. PubMed ID: 27088156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error-related medial frontal theta activity predicts cingulate-related structural connectivity.
    Cohen MX
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1373-83. PubMed ID: 21195774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.