These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31356984)

  • 1. Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression: A Case Series Studying One- and Two-Year Outcomes with Predictors of Minimal Clinical Improvement.
    Knio ZO; Schallmo MS; Hsu W; Corona BT; Lackey JT; Marquez-Lara A; Luo TD; Medda S; Wham BC; O'Gara TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e290-e297. PubMed ID: 31356984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full Endoscopic Uniportal Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Highlight of Ligamentum Flavum Detachment and Survey of Efficacy and Safety in 2 Years of Follow-up.
    Huang YH; Lien FC; Chao LY; Lin CH; Chen SH
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e672-e681. PubMed ID: 31698129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 13(2):641-650. PubMed ID: 33565271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale.
    Takahashi H; Aoki Y; Saito J; Nakajima A; Sonobe M; Akatsu Y; Inoue M; Taniguchi S; Yamada M; Koyama K; Yamamoto K; Shiga Y; Inage K; Orita S; Maki S; Furuya T; Koda M; Yamazaki M; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Mar; 20(1):100. PubMed ID: 30832643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome analysis of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in patients with degenerative lumbar central canal stenosis.
    Wu MH; Wu PC; Lee CY; Lin YK; Huang TJ; Lin CL; Lin CH; Huang YH
    Spine J; 2021 Jan; 21(1):122-133. PubMed ID: 32871276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Microscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Microscopic Bilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in the Early Postoperative Period in 142 Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Gülensoy B; Şimşek S
    Med Sci Monit; 2024 Mar; 30():e943815. PubMed ID: 38491725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full-endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes.
    Tan H; Yu L; Xie X; Liu N; Zhang G; Li X; Yang Y; Zhu B
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Dec; 15(12):3153-3161. PubMed ID: 37853983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Komp M; Hahn P; Oezdemir S; Giannakopoulos A; Heikenfeld R; Kasch R; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25675060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Han G; Ma L; Cheng Y; Zheng K; Qi J; Dong Z; Zhang Z; Yao D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Mar; 38(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 38500426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
    Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.