These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31358327)

  • 1. "No one to consult! That is the hardest part" choice-making experiences for prenatal screening tests among Japanese women and their spouses in Austria - A qualitative interview study.
    Seidler Y; Mosor E; Stamm T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Dec; 102(12):2286-2295. PubMed ID: 31358327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study.
    Bakst S; Romano-Zelekha O; Ostrovsky J; Shohat T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30244627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision-making about prenatal genetic testing among pregnant Korean-American women.
    Jun M; Thongpriwan V; Choi J; Sook Choi K; Anderson G
    Midwifery; 2018 Jan; 56():128-134. PubMed ID: 29101864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding Taiwanese Women's Decisional Experiences Regarding Prenatal Screening Procedures And Diagnostics: A Phenomenological Study.
    Chen MM; Cheng BH
    Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2020 Oct; 14(4):231-240. PubMed ID: 32835863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
    Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision-making process of prenatal screening described by pregnant women and their partners.
    Wätterbjörk I; Blomberg K; Nilsson K; Sahlberg-Blom E
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1582-92. PubMed ID: 24118867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study.
    Potter BK; O'Reilly N; Etchegary H; Howley H; Graham ID; Walker M; Coyle D; Chorny Y; Cappelli M; Boland I; Wilson BJ
    Health Expect; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 18798759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples.
    Lou S; Carstensen K; Vogel I; Hvidman L; Nielsen CP; Lanther M; Petersen OB
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e026825. PubMed ID: 30867204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences.
    Cernat A; De Freitas C; Majid U; Trivedi F; Higgins C; Vanstone M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27. PubMed ID: 30642270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: a mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies.
    Chen A; Tenhunen H; Torkki P; Peltokorpi A; Heinonen S; Lillrank P; Stefanovic V
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 29720125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Montgomery S; Thayer ZM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.
    Crombag NM; Boeije H; Iedema-Kuiper R; Schielen PC; Visser GH; Bensing JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16(1):121. PubMed ID: 27229318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences and outcomes following diagnosis of congenital foetal anomaly and medical termination of pregnancy: A phenomenological study.
    Atienza-Carrasco J; Linares-Abad M; Padilla-Ruiz M; Morales-Gil IM
    J Clin Nurs; 2020 Apr; 29(7-8):1220-1237. PubMed ID: 31887230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes Towards Prenatal Genetic Counseling, Prenatal Genetic Testing, and Termination of Pregnancy among Southeast and East Asian Women in the United States.
    Tsai GJ; Cameron CA; Czerwinski JL; Mendez-Figueroa H; Peterson SK; Noblin SJ
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Oct; 26(5):1041-1058. PubMed ID: 28251433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Men's experiences of antenatal screening: a metasynthesis of the qualitative research.
    Dheensa S; Metcalfe A; Williams RA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Jan; 50(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 22683095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiences regarding maternal age-specific risks and prenatal testing of women of advanced maternal age in Japan.
    Murakami K; Turale S; Skirton H; Doris F; Tsujino K; Ito M; Kutsunugi S
    Nurs Health Sci; 2016 Mar; 18(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 26198748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's decision making regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: A qualitative comparison between 2003 and 2016.
    van Bruggen MJ; Henneman L; Timmermans DRM
    Midwifery; 2018 Sep; 64():93-100. PubMed ID: 29990629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Bohren MA; Berger BO; Munthe-Kaas H; Tunçalp Ö
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD012449. PubMed ID: 30883666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-based patient choice management in healthcare.
    Chen A; Lillrank PM; Tenhunen H; Peltokorpi A; Torkki P; Heinonen S; Stefanovic V
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Feb; 31(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 29504845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.