These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31358561)

  • 1. Multi-trait Improvement by Predicting Genetic Correlations in Breeding Crosses.
    Neyhart JL; Lorenz AJ; Smith KP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3153-3165. PubMed ID: 31358561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness Criterion and Post-selection Parental Contributions in Multi-parental Crosses: Application to Polygenic Trait Introgression.
    Allier A; Moreau L; Charcosset A; Teyssèdre S; Lehermeier C
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1469-1479. PubMed ID: 30819823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of
    Schrag TA; Westhues M; Schipprack W; Seifert F; Thiemann A; Scholten S; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2018 Apr; 208(4):1373-1385. PubMed ID: 29363551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New Deep Learning Genomic-Based Prediction Model for Multiple Traits with Binary, Ordinal, and Continuous Phenotypes.
    Montesinos-López OA; Martín-Vallejo J; Crossa J; Gianola D; Hernández-Suárez CM; Montesinos-López A; Juliana P; Singh R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1545-1556. PubMed ID: 30858235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.
    Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(6):1027-46. PubMed ID: 24727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.
    Oakey H; Cullis B; Thompson R; Comadran J; Halpin C; Waugh R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 May; 6(5):1313-26. PubMed ID: 26976443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of multiple traits genomic prediction, genotype by environment interactions and spatial effect to improve prediction accuracy in yield data.
    Tsai HY; Cericola F; Edriss V; Andersen JR; Orabi J; Jensen JD; Jahoor A; Janss L; Jensen J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232665. PubMed ID: 32401769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating Methods of Updating Training Data in Long-Term Genomewide Selection.
    Neyhart JL; Tiede T; Lorenz AJ; Smith KP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 May; 7(5):1499-1510. PubMed ID: 28315831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-Wide Association Study of Yield Component Traits in Intermediate Wheatgrass and Implications in Genomic Selection and Breeding.
    Bajgain P; Zhang X; Anderson JA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31147390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.
    Wientjes YC; Bijma P; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
    Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):799-823. PubMed ID: 26637542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction ability for yield-related traits in German winter barley elite material.
    Thorwarth P; Ahlemeyer J; Bochard AM; Krumnacker K; Blümel H; Laubach E; Knöchel N; Cselényi L; Ordon F; Schmid KJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Aug; 130(8):1669-1683. PubMed ID: 28534096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-trait Genomic Prediction Model Increased the Predictive Ability for Agronomic and Malting Quality Traits in Barley (
    Bhatta M; Gutierrez L; Cammarota L; Cardozo F; Germán S; Gómez-Guerrero B; Pardo MF; Lanaro V; Sayas M; Castro AJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Mar; 10(3):1113-1124. PubMed ID: 31974097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the optimal number of markers and individuals in a training population necessary for maximum prediction accuracy in F
    Peixoto LA; Bhering LL; Cruz CD
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Nov; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27886337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of genetic architecture on the prediction accuracy of quantitative traits in samples of unrelated individuals.
    Morgante F; Huang W; Maltecca C; Mackay TFC
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jun; 120(6):500-514. PubMed ID: 29426878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection.
    Wimmer V; Lehermeier C; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Wang Y; Schön CC
    Genetics; 2013 Oct; 195(2):573-87. PubMed ID: 23934883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
    Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.