408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31359169)
1. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The added benefit of transvaginal sonography in the clinical staging of cervical carcinoma.
Goldberg Y; Siegler Y; Segev Y; Mandel R; Siegler E; Auslander R; Lavie O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):312-316. PubMed ID: 31628851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Is the Best Preoperative Imaging for Endometrial Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Salvesen HB
Curr Oncol Rep; 2016 Apr; 18(4):25. PubMed ID: 26922331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multimodality Imaging of Uterine Cervical Malignancies.
Mansoori B; Khatri G; Rivera-Colón G; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Pinho DF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Aug; 215(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 32551909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Perniola G; Fischetti M; Tomao F; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Santangelo G; Lecce F; Piccioni MG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Oncology; 2020; 98(9):603-611. PubMed ID: 32492692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.
Kido A; Nakamoto Y
Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20201342. PubMed ID: 33989030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging.
Lee SI; Atri M
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31135294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy in Assessment of Cervical Cancer.
Ghani MA; Liau J; Eskander R; Mell L; Yusufaly T; Obrzut S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 46(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 35995483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HIV status does not have an impact on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) findings or radiotherapy treatment recommendations in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Simonds H; Botha MH; Ellmann A; Warwick J; Doruyter A; Neugut AI; Van Der Merwe H; Jacobson JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Oct; 29(8):1252-1257. PubMed ID: 31413068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body
Steiner A; Narva S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Hietanen S; Hynninen J; Virtanen J
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 33482909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging in cervical cancer.
Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complementary Prognostic Value of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Whole-Body Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Sala E; Micco M; Burger IA; Yakar D; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1461-7. PubMed ID: 26397068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
