These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31359169)

  • 1. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
    Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
    Fischerová D; Cibula D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The added benefit of transvaginal sonography in the clinical staging of cervical carcinoma.
    Goldberg Y; Siegler Y; Segev Y; Mandel R; Siegler E; Auslander R; Lavie O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):312-316. PubMed ID: 31628851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
    Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
    Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Is the Best Preoperative Imaging for Endometrial Cancer?
    Haldorsen IS; Salvesen HB
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2016 Apr; 18(4):25. PubMed ID: 26922331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multimodality Imaging of Uterine Cervical Malignancies.
    Mansoori B; Khatri G; Rivera-Colón G; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Pinho DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Aug; 215(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 32551909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
    Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound.
    Perniola G; Fischetti M; Tomao F; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Santangelo G; Lecce F; Piccioni MG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
    Oncology; 2020; 98(9):603-611. PubMed ID: 32492692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.
    Kido A; Nakamoto Y
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20201342. PubMed ID: 33989030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging.
    Lee SI; Atri M
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31135294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy in Assessment of Cervical Cancer.
    Ghani MA; Liau J; Eskander R; Mell L; Yusufaly T; Obrzut S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 46(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 35995483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HIV status does not have an impact on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) findings or radiotherapy treatment recommendations in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Simonds H; Botha MH; Ellmann A; Warwick J; Doruyter A; Neugut AI; Van Der Merwe H; Jacobson JS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Oct; 29(8):1252-1257. PubMed ID: 31413068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
    Liu B; Gao S; Li S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body
    Steiner A; Narva S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Hietanen S; Hynninen J; Virtanen J
    Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 33482909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging in cervical cancer.
    Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
    Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complementary Prognostic Value of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Whole-Body Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Patients With Cervical Cancer.
    Sala E; Micco M; Burger IA; Yakar D; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Gonen M; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1461-7. PubMed ID: 26397068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.