These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31359376)

  • 1. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.
    Guo Z; Niu M; Wang Q
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7560. PubMed ID: 33828108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli.
    Mruczek RE; Sheinberg DL
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Aug; 67(6):1016-31. PubMed ID: 16396010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.
    Shen J; Reingold EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 11414134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient visual search for multiple targets among categorical distractors: effects of distractor-distractor similarity across trials.
    Ohkita M; Obayashi Y; Jitsumori M
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():96-105. PubMed ID: 24486515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.
    Yamashita J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 30141124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity.
    Horstmann G; Ernst D; Becker S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102859. PubMed ID: 31212105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control.
    Petilli MA; Marini F; Daini R
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104129. PubMed ID: 31765925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor.
    Lubow RE; Kaplan O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 9157182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.
    Lawrence RK; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does searching for faces among similar-looking distractors affect distractor memory?
    McKinley GL; Peterson DJ; Hout MC
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 36849759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search.
    Bichot NP; Schall JD
    Vis Neurosci; 1999; 16(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 10022480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 15521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A feature and conjunction visual search immersive virtual reality serious game for measuring spatial and distractor inhibition attention using response time and action kinematics.
    Ajana K; Everard G; Lejeune T; Edwards MG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2023 May; 45(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 37260369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of similarity effects in visual search.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1667-88. PubMed ID: 22004196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.