These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31360925)

  • 1. Examination and Comparison of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Results of Children with Cochlear Implantation without Inner Ear Anomaly.
    Bayrak S; Mutlu B; Kırkım G; Şerbetçioğlu B
    Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 57(2):81-85. PubMed ID: 31360925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
    Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sensitivity of different methods for detecting abnormalities in auditory nerve function.
    Lu T; Li Q; Zhang C; Chen M; Wang Z; Li S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 32013979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of measuring electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with inner ear malformations during cochlear implantation.
    Minami SB; Takegoshi H; Shinjo Y; Enomoto C; Kaga K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1007-15. PubMed ID: 26062093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in deaf patients with Mondini malformation during cochlear implantation.
    Zhu HY; Chen L; Hou XY; Tang ZQ; Sun JQ; Sun JW; Guo XT
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 279(10):4847-4852. PubMed ID: 35247096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological Correlates of Behavioral Comfort Levels in Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective Study.
    Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Sep; 67(3):210-22. PubMed ID: 26405653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of behavioral MCL using electrophysiological responses in children using MED-EL implant.
    Thangaraj M; Arunachalam R; Gore M; AjithKumar U
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Sep; 172():111696. PubMed ID: 37563011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
    Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.