These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31361158)

  • 1. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.
    Navarro J; Deniel J; Yousfi E; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):123-131. PubMed ID: 27890120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.
    Reinmueller K; Kiesel A; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105718. PubMed ID: 32847736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in cognitive functioning predict effectiveness of a heads-up lane departure warning for younger and older drivers.
    Aksan N; Sager L; Hacker S; Lester B; Dawson J; Rizzo M; Ebe K; Foley J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):171-183. PubMed ID: 27898370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the importance of driver models for the development and assessment of active safety: A new collision warning system to make overtaking cyclists safer.
    Kovaceva J; Bärgman J; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106513. PubMed ID: 34936932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of teen drivers' car-following behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: With and without an advanced driving assistance system.
    Bao S; Wu L; Yu B; Sayer JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105762. PubMed ID: 32942123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of Forward Collision Warning Algorithm Considering Truck Driver Response Behavior Characteristics.
    Bao Y; Wang X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107450. PubMed ID: 38340471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.
    Gaspar JG; Schwarz CW; Brown TL; Kang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():25-30. PubMed ID: 29277383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movement as a function to explore the effects of improved signs design and audio warning on drivers' behavior at STOP-sign-controlled grade crossings.
    Liu R; Yan X; Ma S; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106693. PubMed ID: 35552119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.