These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31361577)

  • 1. Overlooked Evidence and a Misunderstanding of What Trolley Dilemmas Do Best: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
    Plunkett D; Greene JD
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1389-1391. PubMed ID: 31361577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Effects of Hypothetical Moral Preferences on Real-Life and Hypothetical Behavior: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
    Evans AM; Brandt MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1380-1382. PubMed ID: 31361587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Hypothetical and Real-Life Trolley Problems: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
    Colman AM; Gold N; Pulford BD
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1386-1388. PubMed ID: 31361574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Is the Right Question for Moral Psychology to Answer? Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
    Białek M; Turpin MH; Fugelsang JA
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1383-1385. PubMed ID: 31361575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trolley Dilemmas Fail to Predict Ethical Judgment in a Hypothetical Vaccination Context.
    Dahl FA; Oftedal G
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Feb; 14(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 30382789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invited Commentary on "No Correlation Between Ethical Judgment in Trolley Dilemmas and Vaccine Scenarios for Nurse Specialist Students".
    Matisonn H
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):298-299. PubMed ID: 32578490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corrigendum: Comparing the Effects of Hypothetical Moral Preferences on Real-Life and Hypothetical Behavior: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1410. PubMed ID: 31415226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas.
    Bostyn DH; Sevenhant S; Roets A
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1084-1093. PubMed ID: 29741993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do we need empirical research on the use of trolley dilemmas in applied ethics? Reply to commentary by Heidi Matisonn.
    Oftedal G; Ravn IH; Dahl FA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):300-301. PubMed ID: 32639898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Foreign Language Effect on Moral Judgment: The Role of Emotions and Norms.
    Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131529. PubMed ID: 26177508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the legal consequences of action affects neural activity and emotional experience during the resolution of moral dilemmas.
    Pletti C; Sarlo M; Palomba D; Rumiati R; Lotto L
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Mar; 94():24-31. PubMed ID: 25638294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. For the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment.
    Millar JC; Turri J; Friedman O
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24972369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. If it makes you feel bad, don't do it! Egoistic rather than altruistic empathy modulates neural and behavioral responses in moral dilemmas.
    Sarlo M; Lotto L; Rumiati R; Palomba D
    Physiol Behav; 2014 May; 130():127-34. PubMed ID: 24726398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intuitive Probabilities and the Limitation of Moral Imagination.
    Ryazanov AA; Knutzen J; Rickless SC; Christenfeld NJS; Nelkin DK
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 1():38-68. PubMed ID: 29451322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas.
    Patil I; Cogoni C; Zangrando N; Chittaro L; Silani G
    Soc Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 9(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 24359489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
    Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Derailing the trolley: Everyday utilitarian judgments in groups high versus low in psychopathic traits or autistic traits.
    Vyas K; Jameel L; Bellesi G; Crawford S; Channon S
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Apr; 250():84-91. PubMed ID: 28152398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No Correlation Between Ethical Judgment in Trolley Dilemmas and Vaccine Scenarios for Nurse Specialist Students.
    Oftedal G; Ravn IH; Dahl FA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):292-297. PubMed ID: 32189547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: a causal model theory.
    Wiegmann A; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 24440432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
    Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.