219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31361759)
1. What factors are associated with the poor prognosis of anal adenocarcinoma compared with low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma based on a population analysis: A propensity score matching study.
Wang Q; Fu J; Chen X; Cai C; Ruan H; Du J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219937. PubMed ID: 31361759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Survival of Patients With Anal Adenocarcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, and Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Franklin RA; Giri S; Valasareddy P; Lands LT; Martin MG
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Mar; 15(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 26362848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Efficacy analysis of radiotherapy combined with surgery for locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study based on data of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results population].
Zhang Y; Wang X; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Huang Y; Xu Z; Huang S; Sun Y; Ye D
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 22(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 30703799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Relevance of Mucinous Subtype in a Population-based Propensity Score Analysis of 40,083 Rectal Cancer Patients.
Tarantino I; Hüttner FJ; Warschkow R; Schmied BM; Diener MK; Ulrich A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1576-86. PubMed ID: 26714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors for regional lymph node metastasis in T1 rectal cancer: a population-based SEER analysis.
Brunner W; Widmann B; Marti L; Tarantino I; Schmied BM; Warschkow R
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4405-15. PubMed ID: 26895892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of outcomes between rectal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
Chiu MS; Verma V; Bennion NR; Bhirud AR; Li J; Charlton ME; Are C; Lin C
Cancer Med; 2016 Dec; 5(12):3394-3402. PubMed ID: 27781400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Seemed Not to Have Survival Benefit in Rectal Cancer Patients with ypTis-2N0 After Preoperative Radiotherapy and Surgery from a Population-Based Propensity Score Analysis.
Hu X; Li YQ; Li QG; Ma YL; Peng JJ; Cai SJ
Oncologist; 2019 Jun; 24(6):803-811. PubMed ID: 29674444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term outcomes after surgical dissection of inguinal lymph node metastasis from rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma.
Tanabe T; Shida D; Komukai S; Nakamura Y; Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jul; 19(1):733. PubMed ID: 31340778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Marital Status on the Survival of Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Population-Based, Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang S; Chen L; Chen D; Chao J; Shao Y; Tang K; Chen W
Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211066309. PubMed ID: 34910613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-negative Esophageal Cancer After Resection: A Population-based Study With Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
Yang Y; Zhou X; Tang L; Xu X; Du X; Qiu G
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 42(12):924-931. PubMed ID: 31651453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors of overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with resected early-stage rectal adenocarcinoma: a SEER-based study.
Lee KC; Chung KC; Chen HH; Liu CC; Lu CC
J Investig Med; 2017 Dec; 65(8):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 28735257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive Value of CEA for Survival in Stage I Rectal Cancer: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Tarantino I; Warschkow R; Schmied BM; Güller U; Mieth M; Cerny T; Büchler MW; Ulrich A
J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 27067235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Initial cT3 Juxta-Anal Rectal Cancer.
Huang S; Huang Y; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Xu Z; Sun Y; Wang X
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jun; 29(6):809-816. PubMed ID: 30596539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of different histological types of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database.
Zhou YW; Xia RL; Chen YY; Ma XL; Liu JY
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2108-2118. PubMed ID: 33849741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative-intent resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A matched cohort study.
Ecker BL; McMillan MT; Datta J; Dempsey DT; Karakousis GC; Fraker DL; Drebin JA; Mamtani R; Giantonio BJ; Roses RE
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Dec; 69():135-141. PubMed ID: 27821316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Anal Versus Rectal Staging in the Prognostication of Rectal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis.
Goffredo P; Robinson TJ; Frakes JM; Utria AF; Scott AT; Hassan I
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Mar; 62(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 30398999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Duodenal localization is a negative predictor of survival after small bowel adenocarcinoma resection: A population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.
Wilhelm A; Galata C; Beutner U; Schmied BM; Warschkow R; Steffen T; Brunner W; Post S; Marti L
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 29044591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting a dogma: similar survival of patients with small bowel and gastric GIST. A population-based propensity score SEER analysis.
Guller U; Tarantino I; Cerny T; Ulrich A; Schmied BM; Warschkow R
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jan; 20(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 26649434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The survival and clinicopathological differences between patients with stage IIIA and stage II rectal cancer: An analysis of 12,036 patients in the SEER database.
Huang B; Mo S; Zhu L; Xu T; Cai G
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(48):79787-79796. PubMed ID: 27806332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a superior prognostic indicator in stage III rectal cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of 17,632 patients in the SEER database.
Huang B; Chen C; Ni M; Mo S; Cai G; Cai S
Int J Surg; 2016 Aug; 32():24-30. PubMed ID: 27321382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
