200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31362154)
1. Mapping urban air quality using mobile sampling with low-cost sensors and machine learning in Seoul, South Korea.
Lim CC; Kim H; Vilcassim MJR; Thurston GD; Gordon T; Chen LC; Lee K; Heimbinder M; Kim SY
Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():105022. PubMed ID: 31362154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive review of the development of land use regression approaches for modeling spatiotemporal variations of ambient air pollution: A perspective from 2011 to 2023.
Ma X; Zou B; Deng J; Gao J; Longley I; Xiao S; Guo B; Wu Y; Xu T; Xu X; Yang X; Wang X; Tan Z; Wang Y; Morawska L; Salmond J
Environ Int; 2024 Jan; 183():108430. PubMed ID: 38219544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide.
Chen J; de Hoogh K; Gulliver J; Hoffmann B; Hertel O; Ketzel M; Bauwelinck M; van Donkelaar A; Hvidtfeldt UA; Katsouyanni K; Janssen NAH; Martin RV; Samoli E; Schwartz PE; Stafoggia M; Bellander T; Strak M; Wolf K; Vienneau D; Vermeulen R; Brunekreef B; Hoek G
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104934. PubMed ID: 31229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urban Air Pollution Mapping Using Fleet Vehicles as Mobile Monitors and Machine Learning.
Zhao B; Yu L; Wang C; Shuai C; Zhu J; Qu S; Taiebat M; Xu M
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Apr; 55(8):5579-5588. PubMed ID: 33760594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using a land use regression model with machine learning to estimate ground level PM
Wong PY; Lee HY; Chen YC; Zeng YT; Chern YR; Chen NT; Candice Lung SC; Su HJ; Wu CD
Environ Pollut; 2021 May; 277():116846. PubMed ID: 33735646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatiotemporal estimation of the PM
Zhang P; Yang L; Ma W; Wang N; Wen F; Liu Q
Environ Res; 2022 May; 208():112759. PubMed ID: 35077716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrating large-scale stationary and local mobile measurements to estimate hyperlocal long-term air pollution using transfer learning methods.
Yuan Z; Kerckhoffs J; Shen Y; de Hoogh K; Hoek G; Vermeulen R
Environ Res; 2023 Jul; 228():115836. PubMed ID: 37028540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of fossil-fuel power plant emissions on the surface fine particulate matter in the Seoul Capital Area, South Korea.
Kim BU; Kim O; Kim HC; Kim S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):863-73. PubMed ID: 27389997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Machine Learning and Land Use Regression for fine scale spatiotemporal estimation of ambient air pollution: Modeling ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States.
Ren X; Mi Z; Georgopoulos PG
Environ Int; 2020 Sep; 142():105827. PubMed ID: 32593834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial Modeling of Daily PM
Jain S; Presto AA; Zimmerman N
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):8631-8641. PubMed ID: 34133134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibration of a low-cost PM
Wang Y; Du Y; Wang J; Li T
Environ Int; 2019 Dec; 133(Pt A):105161. PubMed ID: 31610367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling spatial variation of gaseous air pollutants and particulate matters in a Metropolitan area using mobile monitoring data.
Xu J; Yang W; Bai Z; Zhang R; Zheng J; Wang M; Zhu T
Environ Res; 2022 Jul; 210():112858. PubMed ID: 35149107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fifteen-year trends in carbon species and PM
Kim Y; Yi SM; Heo J
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 261():127750. PubMed ID: 32712379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting intraurban airborne PM
Zhang JJY; Sun L; Rainham D; Dummer TJB; Wheeler AJ; Anastasopolos A; Gibson M; Johnson M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 1):150149. PubMed ID: 34583078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterizing Determinants of Near-Road Ambient Air Quality for an Urban Intersection and a Freeway Site.
Frey HC; Grieshop AP; Khlystov A; Bang JJ; Rouphail N; Guinness J; Rodriguez D; Fuentes M; Saha P; Brantley H; Snyder M; Tanvir S; Ko K; Noussi T; Delavarrafiee M; Singh S
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2022 Sep; 2022(207):1-73. PubMed ID: 36314577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial Patterns in Rush-Hour vs. Work-Week Diesel-Related Pollution across a Downtown Core.
Tunno BJ; Michanowicz DR; Shmool JLC; Tripathy S; Kinnee E; Cambal L; Chubb L; Roper C; Clougherty JE
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30201856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
