These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31362543)

  • 1. Mismatch 'never events' in hip and knee arthroplasty: a cohort and intervention study.
    Odgaard A; Laursen MB; Gromov K; Troelsen A; Kristensen PW; Schrøder H; Madsen F; Overgaard S
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Aug; 101-B(8):960-969. PubMed ID: 31362543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can We Avoid Implant-selection Errors in Total Joint Arthroplasty?
    Ast MP; Mayman DJ; Bostrom MP; Gonzalez Della Valle A; Haas SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):130-133. PubMed ID: 30794236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection : incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions.
    Jacobs AME; Bénard M; Meis JF; van Hellemondt G; Goosen JHM
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Nov; 99-B(11):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 29092987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A positive bacterial culture during re-implantation is associated with a poor outcome in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for deep infection.
    Akgün D; Müller M; Perka C; Winkler T
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Nov; 99-B(11):1490-1495. PubMed ID: 29092988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.
    Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Khatod M; Yue E; Funahashi T; Barber T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3965-73. PubMed ID: 26324831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?
    George J; Kwiecien G; Klika AK; Ramanathan D; Bauer TW; Barsoum WK; Higuera CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1619-26. PubMed ID: 26689583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reduction of implant-related errors and waste in total knee arthroplasty using a novel, computer based, e.Label and compatibility system.
    Ast MP; Mayman DJ; Su EP; Gonzalez Della Valle AM; Parks ML; Haas SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 23618749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The incidence of late prosthetic joint infections: a registry-based study of 112,708 primary hip and knee replacements.
    Huotari K; Peltola M; Jämsen E
    Acta Orthop; 2015 Jun; 86(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 25813645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologies.
    Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Nelissen RG; Schoones JW; Sedrakyan A
    BMJ; 2014 Sep; 349():g5133. PubMed ID: 25208953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 2019 John Charnley Award: Increased risk of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin: the value of allergy testing for antibiotic prophylaxis.
    Wyles CC; Hevesi M; Osmon DR; Park MA; Habermann EB; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Sierra RJ
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):9-15. PubMed ID: 31146571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) in Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Sobieraj M; Marwin S
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2018 Mar; 76(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29537956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metal wear particles in hematopoietic marrow of the axial skeleton in patients with prior revision for mechanical failure of a hip or knee arthroplasty.
    Hall DJ; Pourzal R; Jacobs JJ; Urban RM
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Aug; 107(6):1930-1936. PubMed ID: 30501001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision total hip and knee replacement.
    Barnett AJ; Toms AD
    Clin Geriatr Med; 2012 Aug; 28(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 22840306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A focused update on preventing ceramic fractures in hip arthroplasty: is the ‘cup’ half full?
    Konan S; Alazzawi S; Yoon BH; Cha YH; Koo KH
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Aug; 101-B(8):897-901. PubMed ID: 31362553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant brand portfolios, the potential for camouflage of data, and the role of the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel in total knee arthroplasty.
    Phillips JRA; Tucker K
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Oct; 103-B(10):1555-1560. PubMed ID: 34587804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification: implications for use of Unique Device Identification 2012 AAHKS member survey results.
    Wilson NA; Jehn M; York S; Davis CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 23890830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of femoral component design on patellofemoral crepitance and patella clunk syndrome after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Frye BM; Floyd MW; Pham DC; Feldman JJ; Hamlin BR
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1166-70. PubMed ID: 22285232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical site infection after primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a cohort study using a hospital database.
    Grammatico-Guillon L; Baron S; Rosset P; Gaborit C; Bernard L; Rusch E; Astagneau P
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1198-207. PubMed ID: 26154882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? Multivariate analysis of two hundred and seventy-six components.
    Hart AJ; Muirhead-Allwood S; Porter M; Matthies A; Ilo K; Maggiore P; Underwood R; Cann P; Cobb J; Skinner JA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 95(8):678-85. PubMed ID: 23595065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.