166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31363821)
1. The influence of knee bolster on lumbar spinal stenosis parameters on MR images.
Simonovich A; Nagar Osherov A; Linov L; Kalichman L
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Feb; 49(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 31363821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?
Finkenstaedt T; Del Grande F; Bolog N; Ulrich NH; Tok S; Burgstaller JM; Steurer J; Chung CB; Andreisek G; Winklhofer S;
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 29651713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction.
Macedo LG; Bodnar A; Battié MC
Spine J; 2016 Jul; 16(7):884-8. PubMed ID: 27032898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thoracic and lumbar spine in diastrophic dysplasia: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Remes V; Tervahartiala P; Poussa M; Peltonen J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 11154540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic MR in patients affected by neurogenical claudication: technique and results from a single-center experience.
Muto M; Giurazza F; Guarnieri G; Senese R; Schena E; Zeccolini F; Diano A
Neuroradiology; 2016 Aug; 58(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 27209418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomic radiological variations in developmental lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched comparative analysis.
Kitab SA; Alsulaiman AM; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2014 May; 14(5):808-15. PubMed ID: 24314904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: does age matter?
Kitab S; Habboub G; Abdulkareem SB; Alimidhatti MB; Benzel E
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 31100722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic Cobb Angle: A Feature of Congenital Lumbar Spine Stenosis.
Chokshi FH; Kadom N; Dwivedi N; Kundu S; Moussa AY; Tannoury C; Tannoury T
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019 Jan; 48(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 29422329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A prospective study.
Merkle M; Maier G; Danz S; Kaminsky J; Tatagiba MS; Hebela NM; Roser F
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 143():4-8. PubMed ID: 26874937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spinal muscles and spinal canal study by MRI three-dimensional reconstruction in adult lumbar spinal stenosis.
Boissière L; Moal B; Gille O; De-Roquefeuil E; Durieux M; Obeid I; Dousset V; Vital JM; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 103(2):279-283. PubMed ID: 28087395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Zeifang F; Schiltenwolf M; Abel R; Moradi B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Jun; 9():89. PubMed ID: 18570636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar spinal stenosis and disc alterations affect the upper lumbar spine in adults with achondroplasia.
Huet T; Cohen-Solal M; Laredo JD; Collet C; Baujat G; Cormier-Daire V; Yelnik A; Orcel P; Beaudreuil J
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4699. PubMed ID: 32170149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Radiographs in Standing Position with supine MR Imaging in consideration of the Sacral Slope.
Benditz A; Boluki D; Weber M; Zeman F; Grifka J; Völlner F
Rofo; 2017 Mar; 189(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28002853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional Supine MRI With a Lumbar Pillow-An Alternative to Weight-bearing MRI for Diagnosing Spinal Stenosis?: A Cross-sectional Study.
Hansen BB; Hansen P; Grindsted J; Rasti Z; Bliddal H; Riis RGC; Boesen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(9):662-669. PubMed ID: 27584675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
