These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31363999)

  • 1. Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study.
    Elliott EM; Marsh JE; Zeringue J; McGill CI
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):145-157. PubMed ID: 31363999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.
    AuBuchon AM; McGill CI; Elliott EM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):738-748. PubMed ID: 30499097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
    Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
    Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What causes auditory distraction?
    Macken WJ; Phelps FG; Jones DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19145024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
    Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.
    Viswanathan N; Dorsi J; George S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 23883307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is deviance distraction immune to the prior sequential learning of stimuli and responses?
    Parmentier FBR; Gallego L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Jun; 27(3):490-497. PubMed ID: 32128721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
    Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
    Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.
    Zeamer C; Fox Tree JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1463-72. PubMed ID: 23565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.
    Hughes RW; Marsh JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):427-442. PubMed ID: 31180705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.
    Marois A; Marsh JE; Vachon F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Feb; 141():64-74. PubMed ID: 30633950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring children's auditory statistical learning via serial recall.
    Kidd E; Arciuli J; Christiansen MH; Isbilen ES; Revius K; Smithson M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Dec; 200():104964. PubMed ID: 32858420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New considerations for the cognitive locus of impairment in the irrelevant-sound effect.
    Stokes KA; Arnell KM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):918-31. PubMed ID: 22371164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.