These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31364195)

  • 21. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Chiossi G; Pedroza C; Costantine MM; Truong VTT; Gargano G; Saade GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The value of fetal growth biometry velocities to predict large for gestational age (LGA) infants.
    Roeckner JT; Odibo L; Odibo AO
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jun; 35(11):2099-2104. PubMed ID: 32546027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prospective assessment of INTERGROWTH-21
    Cheng YKY; Lu J; Leung TY; Chan YM; Sahota DS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):792-798. PubMed ID: 28452092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial.
    Meek CL; Corcoy R; Asztalos E; Kusinski LC; López E; Feig DS; Murphy HR;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33514342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight.
    Sirico A; Diemert A; Glosemeyer P; Hecher K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 51(3):381-386. PubMed ID: 28294442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Large-for-gestational age and stillbirth: is there a role for antenatal testing?
    Carter EB; Stockburger J; Tuuli MG; Macones GA; Odibo AO; Trudell AS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):334-337. PubMed ID: 30353961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identification of large-for-gestational age fetuses using antenatal customized fetal growth charts: Can we improve the prediction of abnormal labor course?
    Dall'Asta A; Rizzo G; Kiener A; Volpe N; Di Pasquo E; Roletti E; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Maruotti GM; Saccone G; Sarno L; Papaccio M; Fichera A; Prefumo F; Ottaviani C; Stampalija T; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():81-88. PubMed ID: 32199297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study.
    Nahirney M; Chaput KH; Metcalfe A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(8):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31189402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Tarca AL; Hernandez-Andrade E; Ahn H; Garcia M; Xu Z; Korzeniewski SJ; Saker H; Chaiworapongsa T; Hassan SS; Yeo L; Romero R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.
    Kiserud T; Benachi A; Hecher K; Perez RG; Carvalho J; Piaggio G; Platt LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S619-S629. PubMed ID: 29422204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal factors and biomarkers in the three trimesters of pregnancy.
    Frick AP; Syngelaki A; Zheng M; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 26446185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
    Grantz KL; Hediger ML; Liu D; Buck Louis GM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S641-S655.e28. PubMed ID: 29275821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Second and third trimester fetal ultrasound population screening for risks of preterm birth and small-size and large-size for gestational age at birth: a population-based prospective cohort study.
    Erkamp JS; Voerman E; Steegers EAP; Mulders AGMGJ; Reiss IKM; Duijts L; Jaddoe VWV; Gaillard R
    BMC Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 32252740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 30779239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
    Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes.
    Sjaarda LA; Albert PS; Mumford SL; Hinkle SN; Mendola P; Laughon SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):63.e1-63.e11. PubMed ID: 24035985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.