These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31364765)

  • 1. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography on the diagnostic accuracy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.
    Sheikhi M; Behfarnia P; Mostajabi M; Nasri N
    J Periodontol; 2020 Feb; 91(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 31364765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Fenestration and Dehiscence around Dental Implants.
    Salemi F; Jamalpour MR; Eskandarloo A; Tapak L; Rahimi N
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Jun; 11(3):305-314. PubMed ID: 34189119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Wanderley VA; Câmara JVF; Santos LA; Ferrari CR; Araujo TT; Chilvarquer I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Aug; 138(2):316-323. PubMed ID: 38493025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of a cone beam computed tomography metal artifact reduction algorithm for the detection of peri-implant fenestrations and dehiscences.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Peyneau PD; Ramirez-Sotelo LR; Vasconcelos Kde F; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 27068312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant dehiscence defects by using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Bayrak S; Orhan K; Kursun Çakmak ES; Görürgöz C; Odabaşı O; Yilmaz D; Atakan C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 32197878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Vasconcelos Kde F; Neves FS; Melo SL; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23217543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do metal artifact reduction algorithms influence the detection of implant-related injuries to the inferior alveolar canal in CBCT images?
    Soltani P; Devlin H; Etemadi Sh M; Rengo C; Spagnuolo G; Baghaei K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):268. PubMed ID: 38395919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an adaptive image noise optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Bagis N; Kurt MH; Evli C; Camgoz M; Atakan C; Peker Ozturk H; Orhan K
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Jul; 38(3):325-335. PubMed ID: 34387842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Capel CP; da Motta RJG; Pauwels R; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Apr; 53(4):233-239. PubMed ID: 38466923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of tube current and metal artifact reduction on the diagnosis of external cervical resorption in teeth adjacent to a dental implant in CBCT: an ex-vivo study.
    Gonzalez-Passos T; Barros-Costa M; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(6):356. PubMed ID: 38834721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do the tube current and metal artifact reduction influence the diagnosis of vertical root fracture in a tooth positioned in the vicinity of a zirconium implant? A CBCT study.
    Fontenele RC; Farias Gomes A; Nejaim Y; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2229-2235. PubMed ID: 32827079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm.
    Khosravifard A; Saberi BV; Khosravifard N; Motallebi S; Kajan ZD; Ghaffari ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 33975812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities.
    Shokri A; Jamalpour MR; Khavid A; Mohseni Z; Sadeghi M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 31035955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis of vertical root fracture in teeth close and distant to implant: an in vitro study to assess the influence of artifacts produced in cone beam computed tomography.
    Freitas DQ; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 29984377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography.
    Meyer E; Raupach R; Lell M; Schmidt B; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1904-16. PubMed ID: 22482612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. b-MAR: bidirectional artifact representations learning framework for metal artifact reduction in dental CBCT.
    Song Y; Yao T; Peng S; Zhu M; Meng M; Ma J; Zeng D; Huang J; Bian Z; Wang Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jul; 69(14):. PubMed ID: 38588680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.
    Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Imbelloni-Vasconcelos AC; Martins LAC; Pontual ADA; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2022 Sep; 52(3):267-273. PubMed ID: 36238703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
    Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
    Eskandarloo A; Saati S; Ardakani MP; Jamalpour M; Gholi Mezerji NM; Akheshteh V
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.