367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31364798)
1. Three IMRT advanced planning tools: A multi-institutional side-by-side comparison.
Lu L; Sheng Y; Donaghue J; Liu Shen Z; Kolar M; Wu QJ; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):65-77. PubMed ID: 31364798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study.
Lian J; Yuan L; Ge Y; Chera BS; Yoo DP; Chang S; Yin F; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121704. PubMed ID: 24320490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of auto-planning in IMRT and VMAT for head and neck cancer.
Ouyang Z; Liu Shen Z; Murray E; Kolar M; LaHurd D; Yu N; Joshi N; Koyfman S; Bzdusek K; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):39-47. PubMed ID: 31270937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements.
Ouyang Z; LaHurd DV; Balagamwala EH; Chao ST; Suh JH; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 31821729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system.
Semenenko VA; Reitz B; Day E; Qi XS; Miften M; Li XA
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5851-60. PubMed ID: 19175141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans.
Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the dynamic conformal arc therapy in comparison to intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate, brain, head-and-neck and spine tumors.
Morales-Paliza MA; Coffey CW; Ding GX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 12(2):3197. PubMed ID: 21587165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Moore KL; Brame RS; Low DA; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):545-51. PubMed ID: 21277097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study.
Wu Q; Manning M; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 10656393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning.
Good D; Lo J; Lee WR; Wu QJ; Yin FF; Das SK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 23623460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Schüler E; Wang L; Loo BW; Maxim PG
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125014. PubMed ID: 31125980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of effective decision criteria for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.
Holdsworth C; Stewart RD; Kim M; Liao J; Phillips MH
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2964-74. PubMed ID: 21815370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
