124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31365703)
1. Skin color affect the replacement of amalgam for composite in posterior restorations: a birth-cohort study.
Chisini LA; Collares K; Bastos JLD; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
Braz Oral Res; 2019 Jul; 33():e54. PubMed ID: 31365703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasons for direct restoration failure from childhood to adolescence: A birth cohort study.
Cumerlato CBDF; Demarco FF; Barros AJD; Peres MA; Peres KG; Morales Cascaes A; de Camargo MBJ; da Silva Dos Santos I; Matijasevich A; Corrêa MB
J Dent; 2019 Oct; 89():103183. PubMed ID: 31449840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AJ; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-7. PubMed ID: 23454330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Refurbishing Amalgam and Resin Composite Restorations After 12 Years: Controlled Clinical Trial.
Estay J; Martín J; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Oliveira OB; Andrade MF; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(6):587-595. PubMed ID: 28857709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 12 Years of Repair of Amalgam and Composite Resins: A Clinical Study.
Estay J; Martín J; Viera V; Valdivieso J; Bersezio C; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Andrade MF; Moraes RR; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 28976841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical longevity of extensive direct resin composite restorations after amalgam replacement with a mean follow-up of 15 years.
Hofsteenge JW; Scholtanus JD; Özcan M; Nolte IM; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104409. PubMed ID: 36623686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient.
Roumanas ED
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 20230960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
