BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31365703)

  • 21. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
    Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
    US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations.
    Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Periapical Status of Root-filled Teeth Restored with Composite, Amalgam, or Full Crown Restorations: A Cross-sectional Study of a Swedish Adult Population.
    Dawson VS; Petersson K; Wolf E; Åkerman S
    J Endod; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1326-33. PubMed ID: 27452294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multilevel analysis of the association between posterior restorations and gingival health in young adults: a population-based birth cohort.
    Demarco FF; Correa MB; Horta B; Barros AJ; Peres KG; Peres MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 40(12):1126-31. PubMed ID: 24102545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
    Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
    Ottenga ME; Mjör I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Composite versus Amalgam Restorations Placed in Canadian Dental Schools.
    Alreshaid L; El-Badrawy W; Lawrence HP; Santos MJ; Prakki A
    Oper Dent; 2021 Nov; 46(6):621-630. PubMed ID: 35507902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct Posterior Restorations: A 13-Year Survey of Teaching Trends and Use of Materials.
    Zabrovsky A; Mahmoud R; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):E273-E279. PubMed ID: 30216130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations.
    Moncada G; Vildósola P; Fernández E; Estay J; de Oliveira Júnior OB; de Andrade MF; Martin J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 25100406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations.
    Kanzow P; Wiegand A; Schwendicke F
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():41-47. PubMed ID: 27575986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.