These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31365703)

  • 41. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Repair restorations: Questionnaire survey among dentists in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland.
    Kanzow P; Dieckmann P; Hausdörfer T; Attin T; Wiegand A; Wegehaupt FJ
    Swiss Dent J; 2017 Apr; 127(4):300-311. PubMed ID: 28480953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.
    Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Osorio LB; Hadani PE; Pinto AS
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 11132507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Curriculum time compared to clinical procedures in amalgam and composite posterior restorations in U.S. dental schools: a preliminary study.
    Rey R; Nimmo S; Childs GS; Behar-Horenstein LS
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Mar; 79(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 25729027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations.
    Al-Asmar AA; Ha Sabrah A; Abd-Raheam IM; Ismail NH; Oweis YG
    Saudi Dent J; 2023 Mar; 35(3):275-281. PubMed ID: 37091274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bond strength of repaired amalgam restorations.
    Rey R; Mondragon E; Shen C
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(5):e5-9. PubMed ID: 26325656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Moraschini V; Fai CK; Alto RM; Dos Santos GO
    J Dent; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 26116767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Immune function effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.
    Shenker BJ; Maserejian NN; Zhang A; McKinlay S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Nov; 139(11):1496-505. PubMed ID: 18978388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite.
    Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA; Gordon MK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Aug; 135(8):1127-32; quiz 1164-5. PubMed ID: 15387051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of dental restorations and removable prostheses on potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders in the general population.
    Kindler S; Seebauer C; Mksoud M; Samietz S; Kocher T; Holtfreter B; Lucas C; Völzke H; Metelmann HR; Rau A; Ittermann T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 35753826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers.
    Lynch CD; Shortall AC; Stewardson D; Tomson PL; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2007 Aug; 203(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 17721472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Proximal restoration increases the risk of clinical attachment loss.
    Collares K; Demarco FF; Horta BL; Correa MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jul; 45(7):832-840. PubMed ID: 29763965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Periapical status of non-root-filled teeth with resin composite, amalgam, or full crown restorations: a cross-sectional study of a Swedish adult population.
    Dawson V; Petersson K; Wolf E; Akerman S
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 25043330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Extent of tooth decay in the mouth and increased need for replacement of dental restorations: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Trachtenberg F; Maserejian NN; Tavares M; Soncini JA; Hayes C
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 18942597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.