228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31366286)
1. Relative age and maturation selection biases in academy football.
Hill M; Scott S; Malina RM; McGee D; Cumming SP
J Sports Sci; 2020; 38(11-12):1359-1367. PubMed ID: 31366286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Youth soccer players, 11-14 years: maturity, size, function, skill and goal orientation.
Figueiredo AJ; Gonçalves CE; Coelho E Silva MJ; Malina RM
Ann Hum Biol; 2009; 36(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 19085511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Biological Maturity on the Match Performance of 8- to 16-Year-Old, Elite, Male, Youth Soccer Players.
Goto H; Morris JG; Nevill ME
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 29461418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the existence, strength, and independence of relative age and maturation selection biases: a case study in Gaelic football talent development programmes.
Fitzgerald F; Campbell M; Kearney PE; Cumming S
Ann Hum Biol; 2024 Feb; 51(1):2349040. PubMed ID: 38809024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selection into youth cricket academies: The influence of relative age and maturity status.
Radnor JM; Oliver JL; Dobbs I; Wong M; Brown TW; Lloyd RS; Kelly AL
J Sports Sci; 2023 Feb; 41(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 37163466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The assessment of biological maturation for talent selection - which method can be used?].
Müller L; Müller E; Hildebrandt C; Kapelari K; Raschner C
Sportverletz Sportschaden; 2015 Mar; 29(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25710395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motion analysis of U11 to U16 elite English Premier League Academy players.
Goto H; Morris JG; Nevill ME
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(12):1248-58. PubMed ID: 25583077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relative age effect in the German Football TID Programme: biases in motor performance diagnostics and effects on single motor abilities and skills in groups of selected players.
Votteler A; Höner O
Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 24047192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hill on a mountaintop: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of the relative age effect in competitive youth football.
Jackson RC; Comber G
J Sports Sci; 2020; 38(11-12):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 31916503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological maturation, morphology, fitness, and motor coordination as part of a selection strategy in the search for international youth soccer players (age 15-16 years).
Vandendriessche JB; Vaeyens R; Vandorpe B; Lenoir M; Lefevre J; Philippaerts RM
J Sports Sci; 2012; 30(15):1695-703. PubMed ID: 22296038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variable long-term developmental trajectories of short sprint speed and jumping height in English Premier League academy soccer players: An applied case study.
Moran J; Paxton K; Jones B; Granacher U; Sandercock GR; Hope E; Ramirez-Campillo R
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2525-2531. PubMed ID: 32723029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Progression in Youth Soccer: Selection and Identification in Youth Soccer Players Aged 13-15 Years.
Bidaurrazaga-Letona I; Lekue JA; Amado M; Gil SM
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2548-2558. PubMed ID: 28394831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The selection advantages associated with advanced biological maturation vary according to playing position in national-level youth soccer.
Sweeney L; Cumming SP; MacNamara Á; Horan D
Biol Sport; 2023 Jul; 40(3):715-722. PubMed ID: 37398961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longitudinal motor performance development in early adolescence and its relationship to adult success: An 8-year prospective study of highly talented soccer players.
Leyhr D; Kelava A; Raabe J; Höner O
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196324. PubMed ID: 29723200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anthropometric and physical performance profiling does not predict professional contracts awarded in an elite Scottish soccer academy over a 10-year period.
Craig TP; Swinton P
Eur J Sport Sci; 2021 Aug; 21(8):1101-1110. PubMed ID: 32886892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. One of these things is not like the other: time to differentiate between relative age and biological maturity selection biases in soccer?
Towlson C; MacMaster C; Parr J; Cumming S
Sci Med Footb; 2022 Aug; 6(3):273-276. PubMed ID: 35866421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construct validity of age at predicted adult height and BAUS skeletal age to assess biological maturity in academy soccer.
Ruf L; Cumming S; Härtel S; Hecksteden A; Drust B; Meyer T
Ann Hum Biol; 2021 Mar; 48(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 34097548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The maturity status but not the relative age influences elite young football players' physical performance.
Peña-González I; Javaloyes A; Cervelló E; Moya-Ramón M
Sci Med Footb; 2022 Aug; 6(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 35277114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age and Maturation Matter in Youth Elite Soccer, but Depending on Competitive Level and Gender.
Ginés HJ; Huertas F; García Calvo T; Ponce-Bordón JC; Figueiredo AJ; Ballester R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The adolescent motor performance development of elite female soccer players: A study of prognostic relevance for future success in adulthood using multilevel modelling.
Leyhr D; Raabe J; Schultz F; Kelava A; Höner O
J Sports Sci; 2020; 38(11-12):1342-1351. PubMed ID: 31680634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
