130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31366680)
1. Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study.
Hasson R; McDermott E; Hanley K; Carroll C; Collins C
BJGP Open; 2019 Jul; 3(2):. PubMed ID: 31366680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience.
Addams-Williams J; Howarth A; Phillipps JJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 267(12):1863-6. PubMed ID: 20607265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during aural microsuction.
Choudhury N; Amer I; Daniels M; Wareing MJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 Jan; 95(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 23317724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective audit of a dedicated ear, nose and throat emergency department and 24-year comparison.
Woods RS; Keane E; Timon CV; Hone S
Ir J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 186(1):247-254. PubMed ID: 26822733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aural microsuction for wax impaction: survey of efficacy and patient perception.
Prowse SJ; Mulla O
J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jul; 128(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 25017385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Otitis externa following aural irrigation linked to instruments contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Bruins MJ; Wijshake D; de Vries-van Rossum SV; Klein Overmeen RG; Ruijs GJ
J Hosp Infect; 2013 Jul; 84(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 23764317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.
Snelling JD; Smithard A; Waddell A
Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19260881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An audit of the E.N.T. casualty service at the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital.
O'Driscoll K; Donnelly MJ; McShane DP; Burns H
Ir J Med Sci; 1993 Nov; 162(11):462-5. PubMed ID: 8113036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Otitis externa in UK general practice: a survey using the UK General Practice Research Database.
Rowlands S; Devalia H; Smith C; Hubbard R; Dean A
Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Jul; 51(468):533-8. PubMed ID: 11462312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual outreach: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations.
Wallace P; Barber J; Clayton W; Currell R; Fleming K; Garner P; Haines A; Harrison R; Jacklin P; Jarrett C; Jayasuriya R; Lewis L; Parker S; Roberts J; Thompson S; Wainwright P
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Dec; 8(50):1-106, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15546515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new patient consultation initiative in community pharmacy for ear, nose and throat and eye conditions.
Hall G; Cork T; White S; Berry H; Smith L
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 May; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 31053122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Earwax (Cerumen Impaction).
Schwartz SR; Magit AE; Rosenfeld RM; Ballachanda BB; Hackell JM; Krouse HJ; Lawlor CM; Lin K; Parham K; Stutz DR; Walsh S; Woodson EA; Yanagisawa K; Cunningham ER
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jan; 156(1_suppl):S1-S29. PubMed ID: 28045591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is a community-based mastoid microsuction service feasible: the audit of a pilot project.
Lewis C; Resouly A
J Laryngol Otol; 1995 Oct; 109(10):971-4. PubMed ID: 7499951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aural microsuction: an analysis of post-procedure patient safety incidents.
McInerney NJ; O'Keeffe N; Mackle T
Ir J Med Sci; 2024 Apr; 193(2):945-947. PubMed ID: 37792209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ear diseases and hearing in the Thai elderly population. Part I. A comparative study of the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment by general practitioners vs ENT specialists.
Bunnag C; Prasansuk S; Nakorn AN; Jareoncharsri P; Atipas S; Angsuwarangsee T; Tansuriyawong P; Thongyai ML; Polpathapee S; Siriyananda C; Chongkolwatana C; Ungkanon K; Chongvisal S; Keskool P; Tantinikorn W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 May; 85(5):521-31. PubMed ID: 12188380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost.
Murphy AW; Bury G; Plunkett PK; Gibney D; Smith M; Mullan E; Johnson Z
BMJ; 1996 May; 312(7039):1135-42. PubMed ID: 8620132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of nurse-led clinics on service delivery and clinical outcomes in adults with chronic ear, nose and throat complaints: a systematic review.
Whiteford C; White S; Stephenson M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):229-56. PubMed ID: 27532317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterising patient complaints in out-of-hours general practice: a retrospective cohort study in Ireland.
Wallace E; Cronin S; Murphy N; Cheraghi-Sohi S; MacSweeney K; Bates M; Fahey T
Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Dec; 68(677):e860-e868. PubMed ID: 30455221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
