These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31366985)

  • 1. The influence of motor preparation on the processing of action-relevant visual features.
    Job X; Golemme M; Bhattacharya J; Cappelletti M; de Fockert J; van Velzen J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):11084. PubMed ID: 31366985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grasp preparation modulates early visual processing of size and detection of local/global stimulus features.
    Job XE; van Velzen J; de Fockert JW
    Cortex; 2017 Nov; 96():46-58. PubMed ID: 28961525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grasp cueing shows obligatory attention to action goals.
    Fischer MH; Prinz J; Lotz K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jun; 61(6):860-8. PubMed ID: 18470817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect.
    Craighero L; Fadiga L; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1673-92. PubMed ID: 10641315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Action intentions modulate visual processing during action perception.
    Bortoletto M; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2097-104. PubMed ID: 21510963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual-motor interactions during action observation are shaped by cognitive context.
    Bortoletto M; Baker KS; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 25(11):1794-806. PubMed ID: 23767924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.
    Amenedo E; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Darriba Á; Pazo-Álvarez P
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():616-28. PubMed ID: 26456119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shifting attention between global features and small details: an event-related potential study.
    Kotchoubey B; Wascher E; Verleger R
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):25-50. PubMed ID: 9255430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional modulations of visual but not auditory processing.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):1063-74. PubMed ID: 16516545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Covert Spatial Attention Speeds Target Individuation.
    Foster JJ; Bsales EM; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(13):2717-2726. PubMed ID: 32054678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-time performance.
    Praamstra P; Kourtis D; Kwok HF; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci; 2006 May; 26(20):5448-55. PubMed ID: 16707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of temporal gaps between successive fixation targets on discrimination performance and evoked brain activity.
    Anagnostou E; Skrandies W
    Neurosci Res; 2001 Aug; 40(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11463483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral, Cognitive, and Motor Preparation Deficits in a Visual Cued Spatial Attention Task in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Sokhadze EM; Tasman A; Sokhadze GE; El-Baz AS; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Mar; 41(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 26377686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How action performance affects object perception.
    Costantini M; Tommasi L; Sinigaglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 31053894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.
    Eimer M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(5):408-20. PubMed ID: 7691565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pushing attention to one side: Force field adaptation alters neural correlates of orienting and disengagement of spatial attention.
    Reuter EM; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):120-136. PubMed ID: 30408253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.