These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31368185)

  • 1. Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities.
    Sager M; Pistone I
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31368185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews.
    Martin GP; Jenkins DA; Bull L; Sisk R; Lin L; Hulme W; Wilson A; Wang W; Barrowman M; Sammut-Powell C; Pate A; Sperrin M; Peek N;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():191-197. PubMed ID: 32726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
    Pham MT; Rajić A; Greig JD; Sargeant JM; Papadopoulos A; McEwen SA
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):371-85. PubMed ID: 26052958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
    Colquhoun HL; Levac D; O'Brien KK; Straus S; Tricco AC; Perrier L; Kastner M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1291-4. PubMed ID: 25034198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.
    Khalil H; Peters M; Godfrey CM; McInerney P; Soares CB; Parker D
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 26821833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
    Evans D; Kowanko I
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions.
    Khalil H; Peters MD; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Munn Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():156-160. PubMed ID: 33122034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews.
    Thomas A; Lubarsky S; Durning SJ; Young ME
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 27782918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: the what, why, and how to.
    McKinstry C; Brown T; Gustafsson L
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2014 Apr; 61(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 24125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recommendations.
    Schultz A; Goertzen L; Rothney J; Wener P; Enns J; Halas G; Katz A
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 29032590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Not Available].
    von Elm E; Schreiber G; Haupt CC
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Jun; 143():1-7. PubMed ID: 31296451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review.
    Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Moreno-Nunez P; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Steingart KR; González Peña LDM; Buitrago-Garcia D; Kaunelis D; Emparanza JI; Alonso-Coello P; Tricco AC; Zamora J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():98-105. PubMed ID: 31521724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.