These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31368728)

  • 1. An N-pact factor for clinical psychological research.
    Reardon KW; Smack AJ; Herzhoff K; Tackett JL
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Aug; 128(6):493-499. PubMed ID: 31368728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample Size, Replicability, and Pre-Test Likelihoods-Essential, Overlooked, and Critical Components of Statistical Inference: A
    Volovici V; Brody DL
    J Neurotrauma; 2023 Oct; 40(19-20):1990-1994. PubMed ID: 37125444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.
    Orth U; Meier LL; Bühler JL; Dapp LC; Krauss S; Messerli D; Robins RW
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):421-433. PubMed ID: 35737548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The registration continuum in clinical science: A guide toward transparent practices.
    Benning SD; Bachrach RL; Smith EA; Freeman AJ; Wright AGC
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Aug; 128(6):528-540. PubMed ID: 31368732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
    Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size.
    Giner-Sorolla R; Montoya AK; Reifman A; Carpenter T; Lewis NA; Aberson CL; Bostyn DH; Conrique BG; Ng BW; Schoemann AM; Soderberg C
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2024 Aug; 28(3):276-301. PubMed ID: 38345247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature - A systematic review.
    Carneiro CFD; Moulin TC; Macleod MR; Amaral OB
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196258. PubMed ID: 29698451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. All is well that replicates well: The replicability of reported moderation and interaction effects in leading organizational sciences journals.
    Crede M; Sotola LK
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38722584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single case designs for early phase behavioral translational research in health psychology.
    Epstein LH; Bickel WK; Czajkowski SM; Paluch RA; Moeyaert M; Davidson KW
    Health Psychol; 2021 Dec; 40(12):858-874. PubMed ID: 34370494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Mar; 15(3):e2000797. PubMed ID: 28253258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainty limits the use of power analysis.
    Pek J; Pitt MA; Wegener DT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Apr; 153(4):1139-1151. PubMed ID: 38587935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.
    Van Bavel JJ; Mende-Siedlecki P; Brady WJ; Reinero DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6454-9. PubMed ID: 27217556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power and sample size in clinical studies.
    Brown TM
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1314-5. PubMed ID: 26403146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breaking free of sample size dogma to perform innovative translational research.
    Bacchetti P; Deeks SG; McCune JM
    Sci Transl Med; 2011 Jun; 3(87):87ps24. PubMed ID: 21677197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconsideration of the type I error rate for psychological science in the era of replication.
    Carlin MT; Costello MS; Flansburg MA; Darden A
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 35404627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Better Accuracy for Better Science . . . Through Random Conclusions.
    Davis-Stober CP; Dana J; Kellen D; McMullin SD; Bonifay W
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 Jan; 19(1):223-243. PubMed ID: 37466102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating neurophysiological measures into clinical assessments: Fundamental challenges and a strategy for addressing them.
    Patrick CJ; Iacono WG; Venables NC
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1512-1529. PubMed ID: 30896211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying error in effect size estimates in attention, executive function, and implicit learning.
    Garner KG; Nolan CR; Nydam A; Nott Z; Bowman H; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39023976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical power from the people.
    Moles AT; Xirocostas ZA
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2022 Dec; 6(12):1802-1803. PubMed ID: 36266457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling methods in personality pathology research: Some data and recommendations.
    Vanwoerden S; Chandler J; Cano K; Mehta P; Pilkonis PA; Sharp C
    Personal Disord; 2023 Jan; 14(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 36848070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.