540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31369124)
1. Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions.
Rees JMB; Foley CN; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1147-1158. PubMed ID: 31369124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian variable selection with a pleiotropic loss function in Mendelian randomization.
Gkatzionis A; Burgess S; Conti DV; Newcombe PJ
Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):5025-5045. PubMed ID: 34155684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.
Burgess S; Butterworth A; Thompson SG
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 24114802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.
Burgess S; Butterworth AS; Thompson JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():208-16. PubMed ID: 26291580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mendelian randomization as a tool for causal inference in human nutrition and metabolism.
Larsson SC
Curr Opin Lipidol; 2021 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33278081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.
Davies NM; von Hinke Kessler Scholder S; Farbmacher H; Burgess S; Windmeijer F; Smith GD
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25382280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
Wang YZ; Shen HB
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data.
Sekula P; Del Greco M F; Pattaro C; Köttgen A
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2016 Nov; 27(11):3253-3265. PubMed ID: 27486138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
Burgess S; Labrecque JA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disentangling the effects of traits with shared clustered genetic predictors using multivariable Mendelian randomization.
Batool F; Patel A; Gill D; Burgess S
Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 46(7):415-429. PubMed ID: 35638254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
