199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31369397)
21. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study.
Burgos J; Eguiguren N; Quintana E; Cobos P; Centeno Mdel M; Larrieta R; Fernández-Llebrez L
J Perinat Med; 2010; 38(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20047524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term.
Ezra Y; Elram T; Plotkin V; Elchalal U
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 May; 90(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 10767512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.
Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcome of external cephalic version: our experience.
Teoh T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1996 Aug; 22(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 8870425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of Persistent Breech Presentation With External Cephalic Version Success.
Lauterbach R; Bachar G; Ben-David C; Matanes E; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Ganem N; Weiner Z; Zipori Y
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 137(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33416280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Sánchez-Romero J; García-Soria V; Araico-Rodríguez F; Herrera-Giménez J; Blanco-Carnero JE; Nieto-Díaz A; Sánchez-Ferrer ML
J Vis Exp; 2020 Jun; (160):. PubMed ID: 32568226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
Marquette GP; Boucher M; Thériault D; Rinfret D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):859-61. PubMed ID: 8885736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands.
Rijnders M; Herschderfer K; Prins M; van Baaren R; van Veelen AJ; Schönbeck Y; Buitendijk S
Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17196716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.
Londero AP; Xholli A; Massarotti C; Fruscalzo A; Cagnacci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 308(4):1127-1137. PubMed ID: 36068364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. External Cephalic Version-A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation.
Cobec IM; Varzaru VB; Kövendy T; Kuban L; Eftenoiu AE; Moatar AE; Rempen A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(11):. PubMed ID: 36363576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes after successful external cephalic version relative to those after spontaneous cephalic presentations.
Chevreau J; Foulon A; Beuvin E; Gondry J; Sergent F
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101693. PubMed ID: 31978624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [External cephalic version of breech fetus after 36 weeks of gestation - evaluation of efectiveness and complications].
Hruban L; Janků P; Jordánová K; Gerychová R; Huser M; Ventruba P; Roztočil A
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):443-449. PubMed ID: 29302977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
