158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31370607)
1. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):4196. PubMed ID: 35778186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power Spectrum Consistency among Systems and Transducers.
Guerrero QW; Fan L; Brunke S; Milkowski A; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):2358-2370. PubMed ID: 30093341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
Luchies AC; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis.
Omura M; Yoshida K; Akita S; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31515646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.
Omura M; Hasegawa H; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 31679096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.
Lavarello RJ; Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2903-11. PubMed ID: 21568393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.
Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3232-8. PubMed ID: 21110618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions: effects of the size estimator algorithm.
Lavarello R; Oelze M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 23007782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring derived acoustic power of an ultrasound surgical device in the linear and nonlinear operating modes.
Petosić A; Ivancević B; Svilar D
Ultrasonics; 2009 Jun; 49(6-7):522-31. PubMed ID: 19217636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved scatterer size estimation using backscatter coefficient measurements with coded excitation and pulse compression.
Kanzler SG; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4599-607. PubMed ID: 18537407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
