These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31370636)

  • 1. How the peak glottal area affects linear predictive coding-based formant estimates of vowels.
    Birkholz P; Gabriel F; Kürbis S; Echternach M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):223. PubMed ID: 31370636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of Glottal Inverse Filtering in the Presence of Source-Filter Interaction.
    Palaparthi A; Titze IR
    Speech Commun; 2020 Oct; 123():98-108. PubMed ID: 32921855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closed phase covariance analysis based on constrained linear prediction for glottal inverse filtering.
    Alku P; Magi C; Yrttiaho S; Bäckström T; Story B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3289-305. PubMed ID: 19425671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice Source Variation Between Vowels in Male Opera Singers.
    Sundberg J; Lã FM; Gill BP
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 26350698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vocal Tract and Subglottal Impedance in High Performance Singing: A Case Study.
    Hoyer P; Riedler M; Unterhofer C; Graf S
    J Voice; 2022 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 35232632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Formant frequency estimation of high-pitched vowels using weighted linear prediction.
    Alku P; Pohjalainen J; Vainio M; Laukkanen AM; Story BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1295-313. PubMed ID: 23927127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring and modeling vocal source-tract interaction.
    Childers DG; Wong CF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Jul; 41(7):663-71. PubMed ID: 7927387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periodic glottal excitation and formant frequencies in the perception of vowels.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():103. PubMed ID: 16012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Evidence That Nonlinear Source-Filter Coupling Affects Harmonic Intensity and fo Stability During Instances of Harmonics Crossing Formants.
    Maxfield L; Palaparthi A; Titze I
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 27501922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The F1-F2 vowel chart for Czech whispered vowels a, e, i, o, u.
    Grepl M; Furst T; Pesak J
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2007 Dec; 151(2):353-6. PubMed ID: 18345278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cyclicity of laryngeal cavity resonance due to vocal fold vibration.
    Kitamura T; Takemoto H; Adachi S; Mokhtari P; Honda K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2239-49. PubMed ID: 17069319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Formant Range Profile for Singers.
    Titze IR; Maxfield LM; Walker MC
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e9-382.e13. PubMed ID: 28029556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating Formant Frequencies of Vowels Sung by Sopranos Using Weighted Linear Prediction.
    Barrientos E; Cataldo E
    J Voice; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38000960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of Source-Filter Interaction to Specific Vocal Tract Shapes.
    Titze IR; Palaparthi A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2016 Dec; 24(12):2507-2515. PubMed ID: 35990794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing measurement errors for formants in synthetic and natural vowels.
    Shadle CH; Nam H; Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):713-27. PubMed ID: 26936555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glottal source-vocal tract interaction.
    Koizumi T; Taniguchi S; Hiromitsu S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 4067067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of glottal open regions by exploiting changes in the vocal tract system characteristics.
    Prasad RS; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):666. PubMed ID: 27475188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voice production model integrating boundary-layer analysis of glottal flow and source-filter coupling.
    Kaburagi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1554-67. PubMed ID: 21428519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized transformation of the glottal motion into a mechanical model.
    Triep M; Brücker C; Stingl M; Döllinger M
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 21115384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model of acoustic interspeaker variability based on the concept of formant-cavity affiliation.
    Apostol L; Perrier P; Bailly G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):337-51. PubMed ID: 14759026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.