BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31370807)

  • 1. Effects of femoral bone defect morphology on initial polished tapered stem stability in massive defect model: a biomechanical study.
    Irie T; Takahashi D; Asano T; Shimizu T; Arai R; Terkawi AM; Ito YM; Iwasaki N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):355. PubMed ID: 31370807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The initial stability of an exeter femoral stem after impaction bone grafting in combination with segmental defect reconstruction.
    Bolder SB; Schreurs BW; Verdonschot N; Ling RS; Slooff TJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 15284981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal femoral reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and circumferential metal mesh.
    Takigami I; Otsuka H; Yamamoto K; Iwase T; Fujita H; Matsuda S; Akiyama H
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 25410982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary stability of a cementless modular revision hip stem in relation with the femoral defect size: A biomechanical study.
    Ellenrieder M; Souffrant R; Schulze C; Kluess D; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(3):2309499020948991. PubMed ID: 32909886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tapered vs Cylindrical Stem Fixation in a Model of Femoral Bone Deficiency in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Russell RD; Pierce W; Huo MH
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 26795255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Proximal and Distal Femoral Canal Geometry Influences Cementless Stem Anchorage and Revision Hip and Knee Implant Stability.
    Heinecke M; Rathje F; Layher F; Matziolis G
    Orthopedics; 2018 May; 41(3):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 29570762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstruction of femoral defects in revision hip surgery: risk of fracture and stem migration after impaction bone grafting.
    Barker R; Takahashi T; Toms A; Gregson P; Kuiper JH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 16720783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
    Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial stability of circumferential meshes with impacted bone allografts for massive femoral defects.
    Guala AJ; Buttaro M; Piccaluga F
    Int Orthop; 2008 Oct; 32(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 17447065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
    Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
    Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study.
    Meding JB; Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Dec; 79(12):1834-41. PubMed ID: 9409797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of proximal femoral bone support on the fixation of a press-fit noncemented total hip replacement femoral component.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Borkowski SL; Oakes DA; Reid JJ; Bengs BC
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2013 Jun; 11(1):e26-34. PubMed ID: 23413131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem.
    Hellman MD; Kearns SM; Bohl DD; Haughom BD; Levine BR
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3698-3703. PubMed ID: 28803814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
    García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managing femoral bone loss in revision total hip replacement: fluted tapered modular stems.
    Cross MB; Paprosky WG
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):95-7. PubMed ID: 24187363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stem micromotion after femoral impaction grafting using irradiated allograft bone: a time zero in vitro study.
    Costi JJ; Edmonds-Wilson RH; Howie DW; Stamenkov R; Field JR; Stanley RM; Hearn TC; Callary SA; McGee MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Aug; 28(7):770-6. PubMed ID: 23896432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.