These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31371423)

  • 1. Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions.
    Charlesworth TES; Banaji MR
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(37):7228-7243. PubMed ID: 31371423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering.
    Master A; Meltzoff AN; Cheryan S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Nov; 118(48):. PubMed ID: 34810255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The confidence gap predicts the gender pay gap among STEM graduates.
    Sterling AD; Thompson ME; Wang S; Kusimo A; Gilmartin S; Sheppard S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(48):30303-30308. PubMed ID: 33199594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.
    Casad BJ; Franks JE; Garasky CE; Kittleman MM; Roesler AC; Hall DY; Petzel ZW
    J Neurosci Res; 2021 Jan; 99(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 33103281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder.
    Handley IM; Brown ER; Moss-Racusin CA; Smith JL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13201-6. PubMed ID: 26460001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender Gaps.
    Diekman AB; Steinberg M; Brown ER; Belanger AL; Clark EK
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2017 May; 21(2):142-175. PubMed ID: 27052431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The good, the bad, and the ugly of implicit bias.
    Pritlove C; Juando-Prats C; Ala-Leppilampi K; Parsons JA
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):502-504. PubMed ID: 30739671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
    Cheryan S; Ziegler SA; Montoya AK; Jiang L
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 143(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 27732018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Future of Women in Psychological Science.
    Gruber J; Mendle J; Lindquist KA; Schmader T; Clark LA; Bliss-Moreau E; Akinola M; Atlas L; Barch DM; Barrett LF; Borelli JL; Brannon TN; Bunge SA; Campos B; Cantlon J; Carter R; Carter-Sowell AR; Chen S; Craske MG; Cuddy AJC; Crum A; Davachi L; Duckworth AL; Dutra SJ; Eisenberger NI; Ferguson M; Ford BQ; Fredrickson BL; Goodman SH; Gopnik A; Greenaway VP; Harkness KL; Hebl M; Heller W; Hooley J; Jampol L; Johnson SL; Joormann J; Kinzler KD; Kober H; Kring AM; Paluck EL; Lombrozo T; Lourenco SF; McRae K; Monin JK; Moskowitz JT; Natsuaki MN; Oettingen G; Pfeifer JH; Prause N; Saxbe D; Smith PK; Spellman BA; Sturm V; Teachman BA; Thompson RJ; Weinstock LM; Williams LA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 May; 16(3):483-516. PubMed ID: 32901575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. We need to address ableism in science.
    Peterson RJ
    Mol Biol Cell; 2021 Apr; 32(7):507-510. PubMed ID: 33793322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM.
    Cech EA; Blair-Loy M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(10):4182-4187. PubMed ID: 30782835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
    Ceci SJ; Ginther DK; Kahn S; Williams WM
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2014 Dec; 15(3):75-141. PubMed ID: 26172066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.
    Lent RW; Sheu HB; Miller MJ; Cusick ME; Penn LT; Truong NN
    J Couns Psychol; 2018 Jan; 65(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 29355343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overcoming gender bias in STEM.
    Boivin N; Täuber S; Mahmoudi M
    Trends Immunol; 2024 Jul; 45(7):483-485. PubMed ID: 38862366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal stability and change across a year in children's gender stereotypes about four different STEM fields.
    Tang D; Meltzoff AN; Cheryan S; Fan W; Master A
    Dev Psychol; 2024 Jun; 60(6):1109-1130. PubMed ID: 38695824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: an intersectional approach.
    O'Brien LT; Blodorn A; Adams G; Garcia DM; Hammer E
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 25244590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motion sickness as metaphor: engaging with diversity in STEM.
    Bergstrom RA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2019 Mar; 43(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 30540205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bourdieu, networks, and movements: Using the concepts of habitus, field and capital to understand a network analysis of gender differences in undergraduate physics.
    Turnbull SM; Locke K; Vanholsbeeck F; O'Neale DRJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222357. PubMed ID: 31513645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.
    Stoet G; Geary DC
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Apr; 29(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 29442575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teaching accreditation exams reveal grading biases favor women in male-dominated disciplines in France.
    Breda T; Hillion M
    Science; 2016 Jul; 353(6298):474-8. PubMed ID: 27471301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.