254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31372691)
1. Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature.
Karim SS; Hanna L; Geraghty R; Somani BK
Urolithiasis; 2020 Jun; 48(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31372691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones.
Resorlu B; Oguz U; Resorlu EB; Oztuna D; Unsal A
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 21855968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pelvicalyceal anatomy on the accessibility of reusable flexible ureteroscopy to lower pole calyx during retrograde intrarenal surgery.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Imai S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 36305835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-Session Impact of High-Power Laser with Moses Technology for Lower Pole Stones in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Retrospective Study.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Tobe Y; Fujisawa M
J Clin Med; 2022 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36615101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Pelvicaliceal Anatomy on Stone Clearance After Flexible Ureteroscopy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Large Renal Stones.
Inoue T; Murota T; Okada S; Hamamoto S; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T;
J Endourol; 2015 Sep; 29(9):998-1005. PubMed ID: 25879676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unfavorable anatomical factors influencing the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi.
Kilicarslan H; Kaynak Y; Kordan Y; Kaygisiz O; Coskun B; Gunseren KO; Kanat FM
Urol J; 2015 Apr; 12(2):2065-8. PubMed ID: 25923149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Association of a Number of Anatomical Factors with the Success of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Lower Calyceal Stones.
Sari S; Ozok HU; Topaloglu H; Cakici MC; Ozdemir H; Karakoyunlu AN; Senturk AB; Ersoy H
Urol J; 2017 Jul; 14(4):4008-4014. PubMed ID: 28670667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the anatomical factors affecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for isolated lower pole kidney stones.
Tastemur S; Senel S; Kizilkan Y; Ozden C
Urolithiasis; 2022 Feb; 50(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 34175984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones: influence of the collecting system's anatomy.
Jessen JP; Honeck P; Knoll T; Wendt-Nordahl G
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 24083332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Factors Responsible for Stone-Free Status After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
Raj K K; Adiga K P; Chandni Clara D'souza R; B N; Shetty M
Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e63627. PubMed ID: 38957512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in lateral position for lower pole stone: an initial experience from Single Academic Hospital.
Peng L; Zheng Z; Xu J; Zhong W
Urolithiasis; 2022 Apr; 50(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 35048132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy on the stone formation in patients with lower pole renal stones.
Balawender K; Orkisz S
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2018; 77(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 28653304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in nonobstructive isolated renal pelvic stones.
Sozen S; Kupeli B; Acar C; Gurocak S; Karaoglan U; Bozkirli I
J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):877-81. PubMed ID: 18643718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Lower Pole Infundibulopelvic Angle on Success of Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Stones.
Dresner SL; Iremashvili V; Best SL; Hedican SP; Nakada SY
J Endourol; 2020 Jun; 34(6):655-660. PubMed ID: 31968995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Scoring System for Optimal Selection of Endoscopic Treatment for 1-2cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Huang Y; Li K; Yang W; Li Z; Liu C; Lai C; He Y; Xu K
Urol J; 2022 Nov; 19(5):356-362. PubMed ID: 35689463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones.
Kandemir A; Guven S; Balasar M; Sonmez MG; Taskapu H; Gurbuz R
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 28589217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Size is Not Everything That Matters: Preoperative CT Predictors of Stone Free After RIRS.
Danilovic A; Rocha BA; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Batagello C; Vicentini FC; Traxer O; Viana PCC; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
Urology; 2019 Oct; 132():63-68. PubMed ID: 31310774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
