These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31372852)

  • 1. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kocyigit BF; Koca TT; Akaltun MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 31372852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and readability of online information on myofascial pain syndrome.
    Bagcier F; Yurdakul OV; Temel MH
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2021 Jan; 25():61-66. PubMed ID: 33714513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.
    Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F
    Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
    Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
    Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Ng MK; Mont MA; Piuzzi NS
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):647-651.e2. PubMed ID: 31678019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
    Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study.
    Aboalshamat K
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug; 26():e54072. PubMed ID: 39196637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transoral robotic surgery: Differences between online information and academic literature.
    Shetty KR; Wong K; Hashemi S; Shetty A; Levi JR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(4):102395. PubMed ID: 32008838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.