These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31373898)

  • 21. Fetal heart rate and cardiotocographic abnormalities with varying dose misoprostol vaginal inserts.
    Stephenson ML; Powers BL; Wing DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22712609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk.
    Handal-Orefice RC; Friedman AM; Chouinard SM; Eke AC; Feinberg B; Politch J; Iverson RE; Yarrington CD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.
    Harman Crowell EH; Crowell AM; Theiler RN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 31455215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Labor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol.
    Eroglu D; Oktem M; Yanik F; Kuscu E
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2007; 34(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 17629164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cytotec: an effective drug for the induction of labor].
    Milchev N; Kuzmanov B; Terzhumanov R
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 12858483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
    Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of the outcome of induction of labor using 25 µg and 50 µg of vaginal misoprostol.
    Loto OM; Ikuomola AA; Ayuba II; Onwudiegwu U
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2359-62. PubMed ID: 22640229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective.
    Draycott T; van der Nelson H; Montouchet C; Ruff L; Andersson F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Feb; 16():49. PubMed ID: 26864022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
    Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.