217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31374187)
1. Comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for EUS-guided sampling of subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Sunny SP; Del Prete V; Antonino M; Muscatiello N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):14-22.e2. PubMed ID: 31374187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration for lymph nodes tissue acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Gkolfakis P; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Papanikolaou IS; Mangiavillano B; Tarantino I; Anderloni A; Fabbri C; Triantafyllou K; Fusaroli P
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2022; 10():goac062. PubMed ID: 36340808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.
Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):895-911.e13. PubMed ID: 38360118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N; Gkolfakis P; Samanta J; Londoño Castillo J; Cotsoglou C; Ramai D
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Needles Provide Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Needles When Sampling Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.
Renelus BD; Jamorabo DS; Boston I; Briggs WM; Poneros JM
Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 32892519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li H; Li W; Zhou QY; Fan B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(13):e0207. PubMed ID: 29595661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
