These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31374227)

  • 21. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on response acquisition with unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Galuska CM; Dawson AE; Brierley KP
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 22407257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reinforcer interactions under concurrent schedules of food, water, and intravenous morphine.
    Dworkin SI; Guerin GF; Goeders NE; Cherek DR; Lane JD; Smith JE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1984; 82(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 6427814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat.
    Cardinal RN; Cheung TH
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 6():9. PubMed ID: 15691387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance on a progressive-ratio schedule of food reinforcement during concurrent access to a sucrose solution or tap water.
    Derenne A
    Behav Processes; 2020 Apr; 173():104040. PubMed ID: 31987848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanisms of resurgence of an extinguished instrumental behavior.
    Winterbauer NE; Bouton ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jul; 36(3):343-53. PubMed ID: 20658865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reinforcer devaluation by extinction depends on the food restriction protocol.
    Baker TW; Weisman RG; Beninger RJ
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 22469648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Keely J; Feola T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):229-47. PubMed ID: 17970417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.
    Hutsell BA; Newland MC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2013 Mar; 101():85-93. PubMed ID: 23357283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nucleus accumbens neurons in the rat exhibit differential activity to conditioned reinforcers and primary reinforcers within a second-order schedule of saccharin reinforcement.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(10):2777-88. PubMed ID: 15548221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.
    Gulotta KB; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():93-7. PubMed ID: 26536304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
    Macdonall JS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16530983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 23144509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Habituation and the reinforcing effectiveness of visual stimuli.
    Lloyd DR; Gancarz AM; Ashrafioun L; Kausch MA; Richards JB
    Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 22868172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: a comparison of two-lever procedures.
    Sutphin G; Byrne T; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 9465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resurgence and alternative-reinforcer magnitude.
    Craig AR; Browning KO; Nall RW; Marshall CM; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Mar; 107(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 28194793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rats' lever-press durations as psychophysical judgements of time.
    Platt JR; Kuch DO; Bitgood SC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 4716170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.