These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31374229)
1. Towards quantitative read across: Prediction of Ames mutagenicity in a large database. Benigni R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104434. PubMed ID: 31374229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project. Furuhama A; Kitazawa A; Yao J; Matos Dos Santos CE; Rathman J; Yang C; Ribeiro JV; Cross K; Myatt G; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Jeliazkova N; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Foster RS; Bossa C; Battistelli CL; Benigni R; Sawada T; Wasada H; Hashimoto T; Wu M; Barzilay R; Daga PR; Clark RD; Mestres J; Montero A; Gregori-Puigjané E; Petkov P; Ivanova H; Mekenyan O; Matthews S; Guan D; Spicer J; Lui R; Uesawa Y; Kurosaki K; Matsuzaka Y; Sasaki S; Cronin MTD; Belfield SJ; Firman JW; Spînu N; Qiu M; Keca JM; Gini G; Li T; Tong W; Hong H; Liu Z; Igarashi Y; Yamada H; Sugiyama KI; Honma M SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2023; 34(12):983-1001. PubMed ID: 38047445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a read-across-derived classification model for the predictions of mutagenicity data and its comparison with traditional QSAR models and expert systems. Pandey SK; Roy K Toxicology; 2023 Dec; 500():153676. PubMed ID: 37993082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data. Guo Y; Zhao L; Zhang X; Zhu H Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Aug; 178():178-187. PubMed ID: 31004930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses. Landry C; Kim MT; Kruhlak NL; Cross KP; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Stavitskaya L Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 109():104488. PubMed ID: 31586682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species. Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mutagenicity assessment of two potential impurities in preparations of 5-amino-2,4,6 triiodoisophthalic acid, a key intermediate in the synthesis of the iodinated contrast agent iopamidol. Rossi S; Bussi S; Bonafè R; Incardona C; Vurro E; Visigalli M; Buonsanti F; Fretta R Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2024 Jan; 893():503720. PubMed ID: 38272634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategy proposal using QSAR models to approach mutagenicity assessment of non intentionally added substances in recycled plastic resins. Djelassi I; Lancia P; Thuillier I; Ginestar J; Fioravanzo E; Baleydier A Food Chem Toxicol; 2024 May; 187():114597. PubMed ID: 38492856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DeepRA: A novel deep learning-read-across framework and its application in non-sugar sweeteners mutagenicity prediction. Srisongkram T Comput Biol Med; 2024 Aug; 178():108731. PubMed ID: 38870727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adventures with Bruce Ames and the Ames test. Marnett LJ Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 Oct; 846():403070. PubMed ID: 31585632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AMPred-CNN: Ames mutagenicity prediction model based on convolutional neural networks. Tran TTV; Tayara H; Chong KT Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 176():108560. PubMed ID: 38754218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metabolism-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for plant protection product residues (Part 4): α-Chloroacetamides. Enoch SJ; Hasarova Z; Cronin MTD; Bridgwood K; Rao S; Kluxen FM; Frericks M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; 150():105641. PubMed ID: 38723937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of performance of the profilers provided in the OECD QSAR toolbox for category formation of chemicals. Aljallal MA; Chaudhry Q; Price NR Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18330. PubMed ID: 39112641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applications of intelligent technology in the evaluation of mutagenicity. Li J; Xu W; Zhang W; Liu D; Jiang S; Liu G; Wang Y; Sun H; Xu W; Jiang B; Yao J Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2024 Jul; 897():503785. PubMed ID: 39054008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanistic Task Groupings Enhance Multitask Deep Learning of Strain-Specific Ames Mutagenicity. Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1248-1254. PubMed ID: 37478285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asking the right questions for mutagenicity prediction from BioMedical text. Acharya S; Shinada NK; Koyama N; Ikemori M; Nishioka T; Hitaoka S; Hakura A; Asakura S; Matsuoka Y; Palaniappan SK NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2023 Dec; 9(1):63. PubMed ID: 38110446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers. Patlewicz G; Karamertzanis P; Friedman KP; Sannicola M; Shah I Comput Toxicol; 2024 Jun; 30():1-15. PubMed ID: 38993812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unlocking the potential of Cronin MTD; Madden JC; Yang C; Worth AP Comput Toxicol; 2019 May; 10():38-43. PubMed ID: 31218266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]