119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31374689)
1. Assessment of an On-board Classifier for Activity Recognition on an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton.
Poliero T; Toxiri S; Anastasi S; Monica L; Ortiz DGCJ
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():559-564. PubMed ID: 31374689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambulatory activity classification with dendogram-based support vector machine: Application in lower-limb active exoskeleton.
Mazumder O; Kundu AS; Lenka PK; Bhaumik S
Gait Posture; 2016 Oct; 50():53-59. PubMed ID: 27585182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking.
Baltrusch SJ; van Dieën JH; Bruijn SM; Koopman AS; van Bennekom CAM; Houdijk H
Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):903-916. PubMed ID: 30929608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceleration-based Assistive Strategy to Control a Back-support Exoskeleton for Load Handling: Preliminary Evaluation.
Lazzaroni M; Toxiri S; Caldwell DG; Anastasi S; Monica L; Momi E; Ortiz J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():625-630. PubMed ID: 31374700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons.
Jackson RW; Collins SH
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2015 Sep; 119(5):541-57. PubMed ID: 26159764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive Simulation of Human Walking Augmented by a Powered Ankle Exoskeleton.
Nguyen VQ; Umberger BR; Sup FC
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():53-58. PubMed ID: 31374606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.
de Looze MP; Bosch T; Krause F; Stadler KS; O'Sullivan LW
Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 26444053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning to walk with an adaptive gain proportional myoelectric controller for a robotic ankle exoskeleton.
Koller JR; Jacobs DA; Ferris DP; Remy CD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 12():97. PubMed ID: 26536868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Exoskeletons for restoring motor functions].
Pantera É
Soins; 2019; 64(837):52-55. PubMed ID: 31345312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Prototype Sensorized Trunk Exoskeleton.
Hass D; Miller BA; Dai B; Novak D; Gorsic M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4537-4541. PubMed ID: 34892226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards low back support with a passive biomimetic exo-spine.
Naf MB; De Rijcke L; Guerrero CR; Millard M; Vanderborght B; Lefeber D
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1165-1170. PubMed ID: 28813979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury.
Lajeunesse V; Vincent C; Routhier F; Careau E; Michaud F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Oct; 11(7):535-47. PubMed ID: 26340538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.
Bosch T; van Eck J; Knitel K; de Looze M
Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():212-7. PubMed ID: 26851481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gaussian Mixture Models for Control of Quasi-Passive Spinal Exoskeletons.
Jamšek M; Petrič T; Babič J
Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 32397455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic and Static Assistive Strategies for a Tailored Occupational Back-Support Exoskeleton: Assessment on Real Tasks Carried Out by Railway Workers.
Di Natali C; Poliero T; Fanti V; Sposito M; Caldwell DG
Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 38391658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.
Di Natali C; Chini G; Toxiri S; Monica L; Anastasi S; Draicchio F; Caldwell DG; Ortiz J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33799947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Actuation Selection for Assistive Exoskeletons: Matching Capabilities to Task Requirements.
Calanca A; Toxiri S; Costanzi D; Sartori E; Vicario R; Poliero T; Natali CD; Caldwell DG; Fiorini P; Ortiz J
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Sep; 28(9):2053-2062. PubMed ID: 32746325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of a Surface Electromyography-Based Upper Extremity Exoskeleton Controller Using Learning from Demonstration.
Siu HC; Arenas AM; Sun T; Stirling LA
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 29401754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design, Modelling, and Experimental Evaluation of a Compact Elastic Actuator for a Gait Assisting Exoskeleton.
Herodotou P; Wang S
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():331-336. PubMed ID: 31374651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Systematic Review on Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions.
Kuber PM; Alemi MM; Rashedi E
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Aug; 51(8):1665-1682. PubMed ID: 37248409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
