BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

769 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31375042)

  • 1. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
    Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hásková A; Radovnická L; Petruželková L; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Kádě O; Matoulek M; Prázný M; Šoupal J
    Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2744-2750. PubMed ID: 32859607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Baseline User Characteristics on the Benefits of Real-Time Versus Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Moderator Analyses of the ALERTT1 Trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 36172693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study.
    Radovnická L; Hásková A; Do QD; Horová E; Navrátilová V; Mikeš O; Cihlář D; Parkin CG; Grunberger G; Prázný M; Šoupal J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Dec; 24(12):859-867. PubMed ID: 36037056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences for Percentage Times in Glycemic Range Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Capillary Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Analysis of the REPLACE-BG Dataset.
    Avari P; Uduku C; George D; Herrero P; Reddy M; Oliver N
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Mar; 22(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 31613142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium.
    Visser MM; Van Muylder A; Charleer S; Isitt JJ; Roze S; De Block C; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Luyten J; Gillard P; Verhaeghe N
    Diabetologia; 2024 Apr; 67(4):650-662. PubMed ID: 38236409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Ehrmann D; Faber-Heinemann G; Guerra S; Waldenmaier D; Hermanns N
    Lancet; 2018 Apr; 391(10128):1367-1377. PubMed ID: 29459019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of flash glucose monitoring with real time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Massa GG; Gys I; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Zeevaert R
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 152():111-118. PubMed ID: 31121275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study.
    Šoupal J; Petruželková L; Grunberger G; Hásková A; Flekač M; Matoulek M; Mikeš O; Pelcl T; Škrha J; Horová E; Škrha J; Parkin CG; Svačina Š; Prázný M
    Diabetes Care; 2020 Jan; 43(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 31530663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    Lancet; 2021 Jun; 397(10291):2275-2283. PubMed ID: 34089660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data from the German/Austrian Prospective Diabetes Follow-Up Registry.
    Sandig D; Grimsmann J; Reinauer C; Melmer A; Zimny S; Müller-Korbsch M; Forestier N; Zeyfang A; Bramlage P; Danne T; Meissner T; Holl RW
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Aug; 22(8):602-612. PubMed ID: 32522039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2023 Feb; 11(2):96-108. PubMed ID: 36702566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple-Dose Injection Therapy: The Relationship Between Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia.
    Oliver N; Gimenez M; Calhoun P; Cohen N; Moscardo V; Hermanns N; Freckmann G; Reddy M; Heinemann L
    Diabetes Care; 2020 Jan; 43(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 31530662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of Traditional and Risk-Based Glycemic Variability Measures to the Effect of Glucose-Lowering Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Kovatchev B; Umpierrez G; DiGenio A; Zhou R; Inzucchi SE
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1227-35. PubMed ID: 26078255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Switching from Flash Glucose Monitoring to Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes at High Hypoglycemia Risk: The Extension Phase of the I HART CGM Study.
    Reddy M; Jugnee N; Anantharaja S; Oliver N
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Nov; 20(11):751-757. PubMed ID: 30265562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of factors associated with improved glycemic control after switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Yamada E; Nakajima Y; Horiguchi K; Okada S; Yamada M
    Endocr J; 2023 Dec; 70(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 37766568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions.
    Boscari F; Galasso S; Facchinetti A; Marescotti MC; Vallone V; Amato AML; Avogaro A; Bruttomesso D
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Feb; 28(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29258716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Poincaré plot quantification for assessing glucose variability from continuous glucose monitoring systems and a new risk marker for hypoglycemia: application to type 1 diabetes patients switching to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Crenier L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Apr; 16(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 24237387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships among different glycemic variability indices obtained by continuous glucose monitoring.
    Saisho Y; Tanaka C; Tanaka K; Roberts R; Abe T; Tanaka M; Meguro S; Irie J; Kawai T; Itoh H
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2015 Aug; 9(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 25456706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Need to Change Regulatory Evaluation of Hypoglycemia in Trials of Diabetes Treatments.
    Klonoff DC; Fleming A; Gabbay R
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 14(6):987-989. PubMed ID: 31744326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.