159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31375105)
1. Identification of single nucleotide variants using position-specific error estimation in deep sequencing data.
Kleftogiannis D; Punta M; Jayaram A; Sandhu S; Wong SQ; Gasi Tandefelt D; Conteduca V; Wetterskog D; Attard G; Lise S
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Aug; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 31375105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA.
Kockan C; Hach F; Sarrafi I; Bell RH; McConeghy B; Beja K; Haegert A; Wyatt AW; Volik SV; Chi KN; Collins CC; Sahinalp SC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 27531099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ABEMUS: platform-specific and data-informed detection of somatic SNVs in cfDNA.
Casiraghi N; Orlando F; Ciani Y; Xiang J; Sboner A; Elemento O; Attard G; Beltran H; Demichelis F; Romanel A
Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(9):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 31922552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SECEDO: SNV-based subclone detection using ultra-low coverage single-cell DNA sequencing.
Rozhoňová H; Danciu D; Stark S; Rätsch G; Kahles A; Lehmann KV
Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(18):4293-4300. PubMed ID: 35900151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantiles.
Van der Borght K; Thys K; Wetzels Y; Clement L; Verbist B; Reumers J; van Vlijmen H; Aerssens J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():379. PubMed ID: 26554718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical modeling for sensitive detection of low-frequency single nucleotide variants.
Hao Y; Zhang P; Xuei X; Nakshatri H; Edenberg HJ; Li L; Liu Y
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):514. PubMed ID: 27556804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Model Study of In Silico Proficiency Testing for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing.
Duncavage EJ; Abel HJ; Merker JD; Bodner JB; Zhao Q; Voelkerding KV; Pfeifer JD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1085-91. PubMed ID: 27388684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data.
Xiang X; Lu B; Song D; Li J; Shu K; Pu D
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20444. PubMed ID: 37993475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EMVC-2: an efficient single-nucleotide variant caller based on expectation maximization.
Dufort Y Álvarez G; Xargay-Ferrer M; Pagès-Zamora A; Ochoa I
Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 37963064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA with a Single-Molecule Sequencing Analysis Validated for Targeted and Immunotherapy Selection.
Atkins A; Gupta P; Zhang BM; Tsai WS; Lucas J; Javey M; Vora A; Mei R
Mol Diagn Ther; 2019 Aug; 23(4):521-535. PubMed ID: 31209714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of Variant Calls in Replicate Next Generation Sequencing Experiments.
Qi Y; Liu X; Liu CG; Wang B; Hess KR; Symmans WF; Shi W; Pusztai L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0119230. PubMed ID: 26136146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applications of next-generation sequencing analysis for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma-associated hepatitis B virus mutations.
Wu IC; Liu WC; Chang TT
J Biomed Sci; 2018 Jun; 25(1):51. PubMed ID: 29859540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DREAMS: deep read-level error model for sequencing data applied to low-frequency variant calling and circulating tumor DNA detection.
Christensen MH; Drue SO; Rasmussen MH; Frydendahl A; Lyskjær I; Demuth C; Nors J; Gotschalck KA; Iversen LH; Andersen CL; Pedersen JS
Genome Biol; 2023 Apr; 24(1):99. PubMed ID: 37121998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing a few SNP calling algorithms using low-coverage sequencing data.
Yu X; Sun S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24044377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive benchmarking of SNV callers for highly admixed tumor data.
Bohnert R; Vivas S; Jansen G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186175. PubMed ID: 29020110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeted mutation detection in breast cancer using MammaSeq™.
Smith NG; Gyanchandani R; Shah OS; Gurda GT; Lucas PC; Hartmaier RJ; Brufsky AM; Puhalla S; Bahreini A; Kota K; Wald AI; Nikiforov YE; Nikiforova MN; Oesterreich S; Lee AV
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 30736836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate single nucleotide variant detection in viral populations by combining probabilistic clustering with a statistical test of strand bias.
McElroy K; Zagordi O; Bull R; Luciani F; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Genomics; 2013 Jul; 14():501. PubMed ID: 23879730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
