298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31376004)
1. Comparison of surgical payer costs and implication on the healthcare expenses between laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in a large healthcare system.
Ayazi S; Zaidi AH; Zheng P; Chovanec K; Chowdhury N; Salvitti M; Newhams K; Levy J; Hoppo T; Jobe BA
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2279-2286. PubMed ID: 31376004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Nieh A; Bildzukewicz N; Sandhu K; Katkhouda N; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3225-30. PubMed ID: 26541730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. S148: Long-term patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication: a 5-year follow-up study.
O'Neill SM; Jalilvand AD; Colvin JS; Haisley KR; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6851-6858. PubMed ID: 35041056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.
Pandolfino J; Lipham J; Chawla A; Ferko N; Hogan A; Qadeer RA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1561-1572. PubMed ID: 31559575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LINX
Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Wu P; Shah S; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26095560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication.
Sheu EG; Nau P; Nath B; Kuo B; Rattner DW
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):505-9. PubMed ID: 25012804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters.
Frazzoni M; Conigliaro R; Colli G; Melotti G
Surg Endosc; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1675-81. PubMed ID: 22179476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The economics of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
Dire CA; Jones MP; Rulyak SJ; Kahrilas PJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 1(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 15017676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Persistent dysphagia is a rare problem after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
Nikolic M; Schwameis K; Semmler G; Asari R; Semmler L; Steindl A; Mosleh BO; Schoppmann SF
Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1196-1205. PubMed ID: 30171395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery.
Rattner DW; Brooks DC
Arch Surg; 1995 Mar; 130(3):289-93; discussion 293-4. PubMed ID: 7887796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of a novel, non-active implantable device as a treatment for refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
Harper S; Grodzicki L; Mealing S; Gemmill L; Goldsmith PJ; Ahmed AR
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):603-613. PubMed ID: 37042668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup.
Heikkinen TJ; Haukipuro K; Koivukangas P; Sorasto A; Autio R; Södervik H; Mäkelä H; Hulkko A
J Am Coll Surg; 1999 Apr; 188(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 10195720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-utility of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for chronic and controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation.
Goeree R; Hopkins R; Marshall JK; Armstrong D; Ungar WJ; Goldsmith C; Allen C; Anvari M
Value Health; 2011; 14(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 21402295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Louie BE; Farivar AS; Shultz D; Brennan C; Vallières E; Aye RW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 98(2):498-504; discussion 504-5. PubMed ID: 24961840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic Anterior Partial Fundoplication is Comparable With Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Lal P; Shah SH; Leekha N; Puri AS
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Feb; 27(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 28145965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter improves gastroesophageal reflux patient-reported outcomes in failed laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication cohort.
Noar M; Squires P; Khan S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2854-2862. PubMed ID: 28039654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of the RefluxStop device for management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in Switzerland.
Harper S; Kartha M; Mealing S; Borbély YM; Zehetner J
J Med Econ; 2024 May; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 38820006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication.
Wu H; Attaar M; Wong HJ; Campbell M; Kuchta K; Denham W; Linn J; Ujiki MB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7709-7716. PubMed ID: 35169878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized clinical trial and follow-up study of cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication.
Draaisma WA; Buskens E; Bais JE; Simmermacher RK; Rijnhart-de Jong HG; Broeders IA; Gooszen HG
Br J Surg; 2006 Jun; 93(6):690-7. PubMed ID: 16671071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
