177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31376236)
1. Radiation Oncology Quality Assessment Tool: A proposal for a new audit tool in modern radiation oncology.
Atwell DB; Booth C; Vignarajah DD; Knesl M; Buddle N; Hoozer M; Min M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 63(5):691-697. PubMed ID: 31376236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External audit of clinical practice and medical decision making in a new Asian oncology center: results and implications for both developing and developed nations.
Shakespeare TP; Back MF; Lu JJ; Lee KM; Mukherjee RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):941-7. PubMed ID: 16297568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a clinical chart audit programme.
Zissiadis Y; Harper E; Harper C
Australas Radiol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16884422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of radiation therapist-led structured peer review meetings on compliance to Radiation Oncology Practice Standards.
West K; Hardcastle-Fowler T; Coburn N; Beldham-Collins R; Harris J; Ahern V
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Feb; 66(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 34747139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument.
Toohey J; Shakespeare TP; Morgan G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Aug; 52(4):403-13. PubMed ID: 18811766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and implementation of a medical oncology quality improvement tool for a regional community oncology network: the Fox Chase Cancer Center Partners initiative.
O'Grady MA; Gitelson E; Swaby RF; Goldstein LJ; Sein E; Keeley P; Miller B; Li T; Weinstein A; Cohen SJ
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2007 Oct; 5(9):875-82. PubMed ID: 17977500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.
Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Tao R; Wong AJR; Awan MJ; Kuruvila S; Aristophanous M; Gunn GB; Phan J; Beadle BM; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Morrison WH; Fuller CD; Rosenthal DI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):532-540. PubMed ID: 28258898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Quality of a Radiation Oncology Case-Based, Peer-Review Program in an Integrated Academic and Community Cancer Center Network.
Thaker NG; Sturdevant L; Jhingran A; Das P; Delclos ME; Gunn GB; McAleer MF; Tereffe W; Choi SL; Frank SJ; Simeone WJ; Martinez W; Hahn SM; Famiglietti R; Kuban DA
J Oncol Pract; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e476-86. PubMed ID: 26931402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External audit on the clinical practice and medical decision-making at the departments of radiotherapy in Budapest and Vienna.
Esik O; Seitz W; Lövey J; Knocke TH; Gaudi I; Németh G; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Apr; 51(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 10386721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating a radiologist in a radiation oncology department: a new model of care?
Dimigen M; Vinod SK; Lim K
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2014 Oct; 26(10):630-5. PubMed ID: 24880572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical audit of a new radiation oncology department in the first 20 months of establishment.
Hui A; Berry MP; Delaney G
Australas Radiol; 1999 Feb; 43(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 10901876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
Mackenzie J; Graham G; Olivotto IA
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Dec; 28(12):e192-e198. PubMed ID: 27633327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The management of interruptions to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: an audit of the effectiveness of national guidelines.
James ND; Williams MV; Summers ET; Jones K; Cottier B;
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):599-605. PubMed ID: 18555671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Radiation oncology clinical audit: a matter of behaviour and performance.
Shakespeare TP; Toohey JM
Australas Radiol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):298-9. PubMed ID: 17504324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. VA-Radiation Oncology Quality Surveillance Program.
Hagan M; Kapoor R; Michalski J; Sandler H; Movsas B; Chetty I; Lally B; Rengan R; Robinson C; Rimner A; Simone C; Timmerman R; Zelefsky M; DeMarco J; Hamstra D; Lawton C; Potters L; Valicenti R; Mutic S; Bosch W; Abraham C; Caruthers D; Brame R; Palta JR; Sleeman W; Nalluri J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Mar; 106(3):639-647. PubMed ID: 31983560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practice patterns for peer review in radiation oncology.
Hoopes DJ; Johnstone PA; Chapin PS; Kabban CM; Lee WR; Chen AB; Fraass BA; Skinner WJ; Marks LB
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 25413419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality improvement in paediatric radiation oncology through peer review.
Murphy L; Cantwell J; Chard J; Cheuk R; Harrington C; Hindson B; Salkeld A; Saran F; Wheeler G; Wiltshire K; Ahern V
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 64(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 32715642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of a real time group consensus peer review process in radiation oncology: an evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility.
Albert AA; Duggar WN; Bhandari RP; Vengaloor Thomas T; Packianathan S; Allbright RM; Kanakamedala MR; Mehta D; Yang CC; Vijayakumar S
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):239. PubMed ID: 30509283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
