212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31376288)
1. Linear and exponential sunscreen behaviours as an explanation for observed discrepancies in sun protection factor testing.
Trullàs C; Granger C; Lim HW; Krutmann J; Masson P
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2020 Sep; 36(5):351-356. PubMed ID: 31376288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Natural Sunlight Protection Provided by 10 High-SPF Broad-Spectrum Sunscreens and Sun-Protective Fabrics.
Hughes SNG; Lowe NJ; Gross K; Mark L; Goffe B; Hughes H; Cole C
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2021; 55():157-169. PubMed ID: 34698042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal sunscreen use, during a sun holiday with a very high ultraviolet index, allows vitamin D synthesis without sunburn.
Young AR; Narbutt J; Harrison GI; Lawrence KP; Bell M; O'Connor C; Olsen P; Grys K; Baczynska KA; Rogowski-Tylman M; Wulf HC; Lesiak A; Philipsen PA
Br J Dermatol; 2019 Nov; 181(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 31069787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Methodology to Evaluate Sunscreens Under Outdoor Conditions: A Double-Blind, Randomized Intra-Individual Clinical Study of a Water-Based Broad-Spectrum SPF50+ Versus SPF15 (P3) and SPF50.
Granger C; Krutmann J; Bustos J; Sola Y; Hosenally M; Trullàs C; Andres P; Passeron T
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb); 2019 Sep; 9(3):589-599. PubMed ID: 31352672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal in vivo Testing of Sun Protection Factor.
Rohr M; Ernst N; Schrader A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2018; 31(4):220-228. PubMed ID: 29791917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: Results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial.
Williams JD; Maitra P; Atillasoy E; Wu MM; Farberg AS; Rigel DS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 May; 78(5):902-910.e2. PubMed ID: 29291958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HDRS - Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal In Vivo Driven SPF and UVA-PF Testing.
Rohr M; Schrader A
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2021; 55():144-156. PubMed ID: 34698044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Characterization of sun protection performance: Quo vadis?].
Osterwalder U; Surber C
Hautarzt; 2022 Apr; 73(4):276-282. PubMed ID: 35333933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥ 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts.
Ou-Yang H; Stanfield J; Cole C; Appa Y; Rigel D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 67(6):1220-7. PubMed ID: 22463921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A sunscreen's labeled sun protection factor may overestimate protection at temperate latitudes: a human in vivo study.
Young AR; Boles J; Herzog B; Osterwalder U; Baschong W
J Invest Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 130(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 20535128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sun protection factor measurement of sunscreens is dependent on minimal erythema dose.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Stc Barnetson R
Br J Dermatol; 1999 Sep; 141(3):502-7. PubMed ID: 10583055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photoprotective efficacy and photostability of fifteen sunscreen products having the same label SPF subjected to natural sunlight.
Hojerová J; Medovcíková A; Mikula M
Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):27-38. PubMed ID: 21277959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory testing of sunscreens on the US market finds lower in vitro SPF values than on labels and even less UVA protection.
Andrews DQ; Rauhe K; Burns C; Spilman E; Temkin AM; Perrone-Gray S; Naidenko OV; Leiba N
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 May; 38(3):224-232. PubMed ID: 34601762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Short-Wave and Long-Wave Radiation Spectrum on the Photostability of Sunscreens.
Garbe B; Kockott D; Werner M; Theek C; Heinrich U; Braun N
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2020; 33(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 31982879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Greater efficacy of SPF 100+ sunscreen compared with SPF 50+ in sunburn prevention during 5 consecutive days of sunlight exposure: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Kohli I; Nicholson CL; Williams JD; Lyons AB; Seo I; Maitra P; Tian X; Atillasoy E; Lim HW; Hamzavi IH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 82(4):869-877. PubMed ID: 31542406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel proposal for labelling sunscreens based on compliance and performance.
Pissavini M; Doucet O; Diffey B
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2013 Oct; 35(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 23802685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sunburn protection as a function of sunscreen application thickness differs between high and low SPFs.
Liu W; Wang X; Lai W; Yan T; Wu Y; Wan M; Yi J; Matsui MS
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2012 Jun; 28(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 22548392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled trial testing the impact of high-protection sunscreens on sun-exposure behavior.
Dupuy A; Dunant A; Grob JJ;
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):950-6. PubMed ID: 16103322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outdoor clinical testing with reference sunscreens to determine differences in skin response between populations of different ethnicity: A combined data analysis from 128 subjects.
Granger C; Passeron T; Trullas C; Hosenally M; Sokeechand BN; Krutmann J; Lim HW
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2023 Sep; 39(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 36867064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outdoor sunscreen testing with high-intensity solar exposure in a Chinese and Caucasian population.
Granger C; Ong G; Andres P; Trullàs C; Hosenally M; Lai W; Liu W; Krutmann J; Passeron T; Lim HW
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 Jan; 38(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34157168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
